Tap Water Results

Is Birmingham, AL tap water safe?

Supplied by Central Alabama Water · serves 653,322 people (217,774 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID AL0000738

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Birmingham gets its water from Central Alabama Water. Parts of the city are served by a smaller system: Mpt Operating Partnership, L.P. Water System (250 people). Your water bill names your system.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit5 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lead
Below action level1.2 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2024 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 4 entry points tested Aug 2024 to May 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.00250.0041Detected, below limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
4.98 ppt7.9 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
1.53 ppt6.1 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
4.1 ppt8.5 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
5.03 ppt11.3 pptnoneDetected, no limit
6:2 FTS
Detected, no limit
1.45 ppt5.8 pptnoneDetected, no limit

29 PFAS tested, 5 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 16 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 1.2 ppb lead (Jan 2024 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 1.76 ppb (Dec 2023).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2024 – now (in progress)1.2 ppb
Jan 2021 – Dec 20231.76 ppb
Jan 2020 – Jun 20201.46 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jul 2019 – Dec 20191.2 ppb
Jan 2014 – Dec 20161.3 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 20132.5 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20105 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20075 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20043 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 20013 ppb
Jan 1999 – Dec 20013 ppb
Jul 1997 – Dec 19975 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
4
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now (plus 1 paperwork)
6
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

1 unresolved monitoring or reporting violation: Lead and Copper Rule.

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese4.36 ppb300 ppb10 of 16UCMR 4 (2018)
Molybdenum2.4 ppb40 ppb2 of 32UCMR 3 (2013)
1,4-Dioxane0.52 ppb0.35 ppb4 of 16UCMR 3 (2013)
Chlorate380 ppb210 ppb12 of 32UCMR 3 (2013)
Chromium-60.13 ppb–32 of 32UCMR 3 (2013)
Vanadium0.3 ppb21 ppb6 of 32UCMR 3 (2013)
Strontium0.074 ppm1.5 ppm32 of 32UCMR 3 (2013)

Where it serves

Birmingham

50 ZIP codes the system reported serving

35004, 35005, 35023, 35060, 35061, 35062, 35064, 35068, 35071, 35073, 35080, 35091, 35094, 35116, 35118, 35126, 35127, 35133, 35172, 35180, 35203, 35204, 35205, 35206, 35207, 35208, 35209, 35210, 35211, 35212, 35213, 35214, 35215, 35216, 35217, 35218, 35221, 35222, 35223, 35224, 35226, 35228, 35233, 35234, 35235, 35242, 35243, 35244, 35283, 35294

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Birmingham tap water safe to drink?

Most of Birmingham gets its water from Central Alabama Water. Central Alabama Water has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Birmingham water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Central Alabama Water found 5 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Birmingham water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Central Alabama Water is 1.2 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2024 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.