Tap Water Results

EPCOR – Agua Fria water quality

Surprise, AZ · serves 128,040 people (53,354 connections) · Surface water · Private · EPA ID AZ0407695

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Arizona Water Company – White Tanks, City of Surprise – Mountain Vista. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 30 samples (2023–2025).
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 95.7 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2024. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved2 health-based violations since 2016, most recently Aug 2025.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 9 entry points tested Feb 2024 to Nov 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 30 of 30 samples. Highest result 95.7 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2022 – Dec 2024). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 14.1 ppb (Dec 2016).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2022 – Dec 20240 ppb
Jan 2021 – Jun 20210 ppb
Jul 2020 – Dec 20200 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2020 – Jun 20200 ppb
Jan 2019 – Jun 20190 ppb
Jul 2018 – Dec 20180 ppb
Jan 2014 – Dec 201614.1 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 20130 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20102 ppb
Jan 2007 – Dec 20090 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20070 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20060 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

2
Health-based since 2016
145
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
293
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Aug 2025After positive bacteria tests, the system did not complete the required check of what went wrong.
EPA record: Revised Total Coliform Rule · Treatment Technique, Level 1 Assessment (RTCR)
Resolved
Resolved
Jan 2022The water chemistry that keeps lead from dissolving out of pipes was outside the range the state set.
EPA record: Lead and Copper Rule · WQP Entry Point/Tap Treatment Technique Non-Compliance (limit TT )
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese22 ppb300 ppb23 of 30UCMR 4 (2019)
Molybdenum7.4 ppb40 ppb56 of 56UCMR 3 (2013)
Chlorate400 ppb210 ppb42 of 56UCMR 3 (2013)
Chromium-662 ppb–49 of 56UCMR 3 (2013)
Vanadium35.3 ppb21 ppb56 of 56UCMR 3 (2013)
Strontium1.5 ppm1.5 ppm56 of 56UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Surprise

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 85027, 85340, 85355, 85374, 85379, 85388

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is EPCOR – Agua Fria water safe to drink?

EPCOR – Agua Fria had 2 health-based violations since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does EPCOR – Agua Fria water have PFAS?

EPA tested EPCOR – Agua Fria for 29 PFAS between Feb 2024 and Nov 2024 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).

What is the lead level in EPCOR – Agua Fria water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for EPCOR – Agua Fria is 0 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2024. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.