Tap Water Results

Is Oakland, CA tap water safe?

Supplied by East Bay Municipal Utility District · serves 1.5 million people (394,309 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID CA0110005

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Contra Costa Water District. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit2 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2024. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 6 entry points tested Apr 2023 to Dec 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
1.3 ppt5.2 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
1.72 ppt3.5 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit

29 PFAS tested, 2 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 21 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2022 – Dec 2024). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 3.3 ppb (Dec 2021).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2022 – Dec 20240 ppb
Jan 2019 – Dec 20213.3 ppb
Jan 2016 – Dec 20180 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2015 – Dec 20170 ppb
Jan 2012 – Dec 20143 ppb
Jan 2009 – Dec 20117 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 20084 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20055 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20055 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 200410 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20047 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20037 ppb

Lead service lines: East Bay Municipal Utility District's inventory lists 0 lead, 3,935 galvanized lines that need replacing, 0 of unknown material out of 408,782 service lines (as of 2026-04-21). Counted by us from the utility's or state's published line-by-line inventory data.

Look up your address · Source (the utility, collected by us on Nov 14, 2026, not EPA data) · Checking your own line

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
0
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
6
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese12.7 ppb300 ppb5 of 17UCMR 4 (2019)
Chromium-60.22 ppb–34 of 38UCMR 3 (2015)
Vanadium2.4 ppb21 ppb38 of 38UCMR 3 (2015)
Chlorate480 ppb210 ppb38 of 38UCMR 3 (2015)
Molybdenum1.2 ppb40 ppb5 of 38UCMR 3 (2015)
Strontium0.32 ppm1.5 ppm38 of 38UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

Oakland, Hayward, Richmond, Walnut Creek, San Ramon, Danville, Castro Valley, Dublin, Lafayette, San Leandro, Orinda, Martinez, Alameda, Berkeley, Alamo, Moraga, Pleasant Hill, Hercules, Blackhawk, Pinole, Rodeo, El Cerrito, San Lorenzo, Albany, Diablo, Crockett

64 ZIP codes the system reported serving

94501, 94502, 94506, 94507, 94523, 94525, 94526, 94528, 94530, 94541, 94542, 94544, 94545, 94546, 94547, 94549, 94552, 94553, 94556, 94563, 94564, 94568, 94569, 94572, 94577, 94578, 94579, 94580, 94582, 94583, 94595, 94596, 94597, 94598, 94601, 94602, 94603, 94605, 94606, 94607, 94608, 94609, 94610, 94611, 94612, 94613, 94618, 94619, 94621, 94702, 94703, 94704, 94705, 94706, 94707, 94708, 94709, 94710, 94720, 94801, 94803, 94804, 94805, 94806

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Oakland tap water safe to drink?

Most of Oakland gets its water from East Bay Municipal Utility District. East Bay Municipal Utility District has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Oakland water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of East Bay Municipal Utility District found 2 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Oakland water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for East Bay Municipal Utility District is 0 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2024. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.