Tap Water Results

California Water Service – Dominguez water quality

Torrance, CA · serves 149,490 people (33,119 connections) · Purchased surface water · Private · EPA ID CA1910033

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Metropolitan Water District of SO. Cal.. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit1 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 64.7 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level1.8 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2023. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 9 entry points tested Jan 2024 to Oct 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Detected, below limit
Limit 10 ppt
3.3 ppt
33% of the limit
3.5 ppt10 pptDetected, below limit
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.330.351Detected, below limit
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 1 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 6 of 19 samples. Highest result 64.7 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 1.8 ppb lead (Jan 2021 – Dec 2023). Below action level

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2021 – Dec 20231.8 ppb
Jan 2018 – Dec 20200 ppb
Jan 2015 – Dec 20170 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2012 – Dec 20140 ppb
Jan 2010 – Dec 20120 ppb
Jan 2007 – Dec 20090 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 20063 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20063 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20055 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20045 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20035 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 20030 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
4
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
8
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese23 ppb300 ppb17 of 18UCMR 4 (2019)
Molybdenum5.6 ppb40 ppb35 of 39UCMR 3 (2015)
Strontium1.2 ppm1.5 ppm39 of 39UCMR 3 (2015)
Vanadium4 ppb21 ppb32 of 39UCMR 3 (2015)
Chromium-60.065 ppb–24 of 39UCMR 3 (2015)
Chlorate710 ppb210 ppb39 of 39UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

Torrance, Carson, Compton, Redondo Beach, West Carson

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 90220, 90221, 90248, 90277, 90278, 90501, 90502, 90503, 90504, 90505, 90710, 90744, 90745, 90746, 90747, 90805, 90807, 90810

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is California Water Service – Dominguez water safe to drink?

California Water Service – Dominguez has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does California Water Service – Dominguez water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of California Water Service – Dominguez found 1 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in California Water Service – Dominguez water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for California Water Service – Dominguez is 1.8 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2023. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.