Tap Water Results

Is Pasadena, CA tap water safe?

Supplied by Pasadena Water and Power · serves 165,448 people (38,591 connections) · Purchased surface water · EPA ID CA1910124

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Pasadena gets its water from Pasadena Water and Power. Parts of the city are served by a smaller system: Valley Water Company (10,113 people). Your water bill names your system.

Buys water from Kinneloa Irrigation District, Metropolitan Water District of SO. Cal., City of South Pasadena, Rubio Canon Land & Water Association, Valley Water Company. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 14 samples (2023–2025).
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 64.2 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level1.9 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2024 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 4 entry points tested Jul 2023 to Apr 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 10 of 14 samples. Highest result 64.2 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 1.9 ppb lead (Jan 2024 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2024 – now (in progress)1.9 ppb
Jan 2021 – Dec 20230 ppb
Jan 2018 – Dec 20201.8 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2015 – Dec 20170 ppb
Jan 2012 – Dec 20141.7 ppb
Jan 2009 – Dec 20111.9 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 20082 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20052 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20052 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20042 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20022 ppb
Jan 2000 – Dec 20022 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
0
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
4
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese30 ppb300 ppb11 of 19UCMR 4 (2020)
Chlorate130 ppb210 ppb25 of 25UCMR 3 (2013)
Molybdenum16 ppb40 ppb25 of 25UCMR 3 (2013)
Strontium0.96 ppm1.5 ppm25 of 25UCMR 3 (2013)
Vanadium15 ppb21 ppb25 of 25UCMR 3 (2013)
Chromium-66.6 ppb–25 of 25UCMR 3 (2013)

Where it serves

Pasadena

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 91001, 91101, 91102, 91103, 91104, 91105, 91106, 91107, 91109, 91150, 91775

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Pasadena tap water safe to drink?

Most of Pasadena gets its water from Pasadena Water and Power. Pasadena Water and Power has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Pasadena water have PFAS?

EPA tested Pasadena Water and Power for 29 PFAS between Jul 2023 and Apr 2024 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).

What is the lead level in Pasadena water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Pasadena Water and Power is 1.9 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2024 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.