Yosemite Spring Park Utilities Company water quality
Coarsegold, CA · serves 5,300 people (1,957 connections) · Groundwater · Private · EPA ID CA2010005
Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it
Summary
PFAS above the 2024 federal limits, plus an unresolved health-based violation. Systems have until 2029 to meet the PFAS limits.
Is it an emergency? No: these findings are about longer-term exposure, and nothing in EPA's data calls for you to stop drinking the water today. If your utility ever issues a boil-water or do-not-drink notice, follow it.
- PFAS
- Above limitPFOA, PFOS above the federal limit in EPA's 2023–2025 testing (PFOA 6.4 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, PFOS 6.9 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, where ppt = parts per trillion).
- Lithium
- Above screening levelHighest result 106 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
- Lead
- Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2026 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
- Violations
- 1 unresolved13 health-based violations since 2016, most recently Oct 2024.
- Pregnant, or mixing baby formula with tap water? Babies drink more water for their size, so PFAS exposure matters more for them. Consider bottled water or a filter certified for PFAS for formula, and ask your doctor. Health effects.
- To lower your PFAS exposure now, a home filter certified for PFAS reduction works (reverse osmosis, or activated carbon certified to NSF/ANSI 53 or 58). Filters for these results.
- Built before 1986, or not sure what your service line is made of? Check your service line and test your tap. Utility data can't show your pipes.
- Tested your own tap? Compare your result with these numbers. Moving? Compare this system with another.
- Read Yosemite Spring Park Utilities Company's annual water quality report (Consumer Confidence Report). It lists every regulated contaminant tested and is usually on the utility's website or mailed with your bill, and you can also request it at (559) 760-3818. EPA: how to find it.
PFAS (“forever chemicals”)
EPA UCMR 5: 9 entry points tested Mar 2025 to Nov 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.
| Contaminant | Highest average |
|---|---|
| PFOA Above limit Limit 4 ppt | 6.4 ppt 1.6× the limit |
| PFOS Above limit Limit 4 ppt | 6.9 ppt 1.72× the limit |
| PFHxS Rounds to the limit Limit 10 ppt | 10.3 ppt at the limit |
| PFNA Not detected Limit 10 ppt | – |
| HFPO-DA (GenX) Not detected Limit 10 ppt | – |
| Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit) Rounds to the limit Limit 1 | 1.03 |
| PFBS Detected, below limit Guideline 2,000 ppt | 12.9 ppt |
| PFBA Not detected Guideline 6,000 ppt | – |
| PFHxA Detected, below limit Guideline 3,000 ppt | 1.65 ppt |
| PFPeA Detected, no limit | 1.85 ppt |
Why "rounds to the limit"? the PFHxS average (10.3 ppt) and the Hazard Index (1.03) are slightly above the number on paper, but EPA compares results after rounding to the limit's precision (4.4 ppt rounds to 4), so they meet the limit as EPA applies it. Close enough to the limit to be worth watching.
For context: the PFOA average is higher than at 92% of the California systems EPA tested and the PFOS average is higher than at 87% of the California systems EPA tested.
29 PFAS tested, 6 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.
Lithium
Detected in 18 of 18 samples. Highest result 106 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.
Lead and copper
Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2026 – now (in progress)). Below action level
Highest since 2016: 9.2 ppb (Dec 2016).
| Monitoring period | Lead (90th pct.) |
|---|---|
| Jan 2026 – now (in progress) | 0 ppb |
| Jan 2020 – Dec 2022 | 8.4 ppb |
| Jan 2017 – Dec 2019 | 3.9 ppb |
Earlier results (9)
| Jan 2014 – Dec 2016 | 9.2 ppb |
| Jan 2011 – Dec 2013 | 5.8 ppb |
| Jan 2008 – Dec 2010 | 10 ppb |
| Jan 2005 – Dec 2007 | 5.2 ppb |
| Jan 2004 – Dec 2004 | 12 ppb |
| Jan 2002 – Dec 2004 | 12 ppb |
| Jan 2002 – Dec 2002 | 5.2 ppb |
| Jan 1998 – Dec 1998 | 9.2 ppb |
| Jan 1996 – Dec 1998 | 9.2 ppb |
Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.
Violations
| When | What happened |
|---|---|
| Oct 2024 | The system did not publish the required inventory of lead service lines (due October 2024). It says nothing about lead levels in the water. EPA record: Lead and copper rule revisions · LSL Inventory Unaddressed |
| Jan 2020 – Oct 2022 12 times | The running annual average for Fluoride was above the legal limit. EPA record: Fluoride · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average · measured 2.1 mg/l (limit 4.0 mg/L) Resolved |
1 unresolved monitoring or reporting violation: Lead and copper rule revisions.
Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.
Where it serves
ZIP codes the system reported serving: 93614
Questions
Is Yosemite Spring Park Utilities Company water safe to drink?
Yosemite Spring Park Utilities Company has 1 unresolved health-based violation on record. EPA testing found PFAS above the 2024 federal limits, which systems must meet by 2029. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.
Does Yosemite Spring Park Utilities Company water have PFAS?
Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Yosemite Spring Park Utilities Company found 6 PFAS at least once. The highest entry-point averages were above the federal limit for PFOA and PFOS: PFOA 6.4 ppt, PFOS 6.9 ppt (limit 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt for the others).
What is the lead level in Yosemite Spring Park Utilities Company water?
The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Yosemite Spring Park Utilities Company is 0 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2026 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.
Check these numbers yourself
Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:
- EPA's own report for CA2010005: violations, enforcement and inspections, straight from EPA.
- EPA UCMR 5 data: the PFAS and lithium results (search the file for PWSID CA2010005).
- EPA SDWIS download: the lead results, population and violation records we use.
- The utility's annual water quality report (Consumer Confidence Report): ask Yosemite Spring Park Utilities Company at (559) 760-3818, or see EPA's guide to finding it.
Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.
Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.