Tap Water Results

Padre Dam Municipal Water District water quality

Santee, CA · serves 93,980 people (23,443 connections) · Purchased surface water · Local government · EPA ID CA3710037

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Helix Water District, San Diego County Water Authority. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit1 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 47 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level1.1 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2025. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 2 entry points tested Feb 2023 to Nov 2023. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
1.45 ppt5.8 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 1 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 7 of 8 samples. Highest result 47 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 1.1 ppb lead (Jan 2023 – Dec 2025). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 2 ppb (Dec 2022).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2023 – Dec 20251.1 ppb
Jan 2020 – Dec 20222 ppb
Jan 2017 – Dec 20190 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2014 – Dec 20160 ppb
Jan 2016 – Jun 20160 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 20130 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20100 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20070 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20049 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20049 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 20036 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 20016 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
0
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
2
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese2.5 ppb300 ppb6 of 8UCMR 4 (2018)
Chromium-60.059 ppb–8 of 8UCMR 3 (2013)
Strontium0.86 ppm1.5 ppm8 of 8UCMR 3 (2013)
Molybdenum3.9 ppb40 ppb8 of 8UCMR 3 (2013)
Vanadium2.2 ppb21 ppb7 of 8UCMR 3 (2013)
Chlorate190 ppb210 ppb6 of 8UCMR 3 (2013)

Where it serves

Santee, Alpine, El Cajon, Rancho San Diego

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 91901, 92019, 92020, 92021, 92040, 92071

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Padre Dam Municipal Water District water safe to drink?

Padre Dam Municipal Water District has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Padre Dam Municipal Water District water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Padre Dam Municipal Water District found 1 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Padre Dam Municipal Water District water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Padre Dam Municipal Water District is 1.1 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2025. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.