Is Manteca, CA tap water safe?
Supplied by City of Manteca · serves 84,928 people (30,489 connections) · Purchased surface water · EPA ID CA3910005
Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it
Buys water from South San Joaquin Irrigation District. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.
Summary
PFAS above the 2024 federal limits. Systems have until 2029 to meet the PFAS limits.
Is it an emergency? No: PFAS limits are about years of exposure, not a glass of water, and nothing in EPA's data calls for you to stop drinking the water today. If your utility ever issues a boil-water or do-not-drink notice, follow it.
- PFAS
- Above limitPFOA, PFHxS above the federal limit in EPA's 2023–2025 testing (PFOA 6.1 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, PFHxS 18.5 ppt vs a limit of 10 ppt, where ppt = parts per trillion).
- Lead
- Below action level0.4 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2024. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
- Violations
- None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
- Pregnant, or mixing baby formula with tap water? Babies drink more water for their size, so PFAS exposure matters more for them. Consider bottled water or a filter certified for PFAS for formula, and ask your doctor. Health effects.
- To lower your PFAS exposure now, a home filter certified for PFAS reduction works (reverse osmosis, or activated carbon certified to NSF/ANSI 53 or 58). Filters for these results.
- Built before 1986, or not sure what your service line is made of? Check your service line and test your tap. Utility data can't show your pipes.
- Tested your own tap? Compare your result with these numbers. Moving? Compare this system with another.
- Read City of Manteca's annual water quality report (Consumer Confidence Report). It lists every regulated contaminant tested and is usually on the utility's website or mailed with your bill, and you can also request it at (209) 456-8468. EPA: how to find it.
PFAS (“forever chemicals”)
EPA UCMR 5: 11 entry points tested Jan 2025 to Oct 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.
| Contaminant | Highest average |
|---|---|
| PFOA Above limit Limit 4 ppt | 6.1 ppt 1.53× the limit |
| PFOS Not detected Limit 4 ppt | – |
| PFHxS Above limit Limit 10 ppt | 18.5 ppt 1.85× the limit |
| PFNA Not detected Limit 10 ppt | – |
| HFPO-DA (GenX) Not detected Limit 10 ppt | – |
| Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit) Rounds to the limit Limit 1 | 1.85 |
| PFBS Detected, below limit Guideline 2,000 ppt | 3.6 ppt |
| PFBA Not detected Guideline 6,000 ppt | – |
| PFHxA Detected, below limit Guideline 3,000 ppt | 8.7 ppt |
Why "rounds to the limit"? the Hazard Index (1.85) is slightly above the number on paper, but EPA compares results after rounding to the limit's precision (4.4 ppt rounds to 4), so it meets the limit as EPA applies it. Close enough to the limit to be worth watching.
For context: the PFOA average is higher than at 91% of the California systems EPA tested and the PFHxS average is higher than at 98% of the California systems EPA tested.
29 PFAS tested, 4 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.
Lithium
Not detected in 24 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.
Lead and copper
Latest 90th percentile: 0.4 ppb lead (Jan 2022 – Dec 2024). Below action level
Highest since 2016: 0.7 ppb (Dec 2018).
| Monitoring period | Lead (90th pct.) |
|---|---|
| Jan 2022 – Dec 2024 | 0.4 ppb |
| Jan 2019 – Dec 2021 | 0.4 ppb |
| Jan 2016 – Dec 2018 | 0.7 ppb |
Earlier results (9)
| Jan 2013 – Dec 2015 | 1.1 ppb |
| Jan 2010 – Dec 2012 | 2.5 ppb |
| Jan 2009 – Dec 2009 | 1.4 ppb |
| Jan 2006 – Dec 2006 | 5 ppb |
| Jan 2005 – Dec 2005 | 5 ppb |
| Jan 2002 – Dec 2004 | 2 ppb |
| Jan 2003 – Dec 2003 | 4 ppb |
| Jan 2002 – Dec 2002 | 2.5 ppb |
| Jan 1999 – Dec 2001 | 0 ppb |
Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.
Violations
Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.
Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)
| Contaminant | Highest | Guideline |
|---|---|---|
| Manganese | 210 ppb | 300 ppb |
| Strontium | 1.4 ppm | 1.5 ppm |
| 1,2,3-Trichloropropane (TCP) | 0.04 ppb | 0.0004 ppb |
| Chromium-6 | 4.5 ppb | – |
| Chlorate | 770 ppb | 210 ppb |
| Vanadium | 54 ppb | 21 ppb |
| Molybdenum | 2.8 ppb | 40 ppb |
Where it serves
Manteca
ZIP codes the system reported serving: 95336, 95337
Nearby utilities
- City of Lathrop Lathrop · 5 mi · PFAS above limit
- City of Ripon Ripon · 6 mi · PFAS above limit
- City of Tracy Tracy · 13 mi
- California Water Service – Stockton Stockton · 14 mi
- City of Stockton Stockton · 14 mi · PFAS above limit
- City of Modesto Modesto · 16 mi · PFAS above limit
Questions
Is Manteca tap water safe to drink?
Most of Manteca gets its water from City of Manteca. City of Manteca has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found PFAS above the 2024 federal limits, which systems must meet by 2029. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.
Does Manteca water have PFAS?
Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of City of Manteca found 4 PFAS at least once. The highest entry-point averages were above the federal limit for PFOA and PFHxS: PFOA 6.1 ppt, PFHxS 18.5 ppt (limit 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt for the others).
What is the lead level in Manteca water?
The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of Manteca is 0.4 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2024. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.
Check these numbers yourself
Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:
- EPA's own report for CA3910005: violations, enforcement and inspections, straight from EPA.
- EPA UCMR 5 data: the PFAS and lithium results (search the file for PWSID CA3910005).
- EPA SDWIS download: the lead results, population and violation records we use.
- The utility's annual water quality report (Consumer Confidence Report): ask City of Manteca at (209) 456-8468, or see EPA's guide to finding it.
Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.
Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.