Tap Water Results

Is Thornton, CO tap water safe?

Supplied by City of Thornton · serves 226,465 people (42,530 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID CO0101150

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Thornton gets its water from City of Thornton. Parts of the city are served by 7 smaller systems: Todd Creek Village Metropolitan District (7,363 people), Woodland Hills Mhc Water System (1,740 people), Redwood Estates Water System (1,500 people), The Grove at Alta Ridge Water System (1,300 people) and 3 more. Your water bill names your system.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit8 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 34 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level2.3 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2025. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 2 entry points tested Feb 2023 to Nov 2023. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
One sample above limit
Limit 4 ppt
3.4 ppt
85% of the limit
7.1 ppt4 pptOne sample above limit
PFOS
One sample above limit
Limit 4 ppt
2.38 ppt
59% of the limit
5 ppt4 pptOne sample above limit
PFHxS
Detected, below limit
Limit 10 ppt
2.52 ppt
25% of the limit
5.9 ppt10 pptDetected, below limit
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.260.591Detected, below limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
5.63 ppt8.1 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
6.17 ppt10.4 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
8.18 ppt12.6 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
8 ppt12.4 pptnoneDetected, no limit
PFHpA
Detected, no limit
1.72 ppt3.7 pptnoneDetected, no limit

29 PFAS tested, 8 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 7 of 7 samples. Highest result 34 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 2.3 ppb lead (Jan 2025 – Dec 2025). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 2.5 ppb (Dec 2020).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2025 – Dec 20252.3 ppb
Jan 2024 – Dec 20241.4 ppb
Jul 2023 – Dec 20231.4 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2023 – Jun 20231.7 ppb
Jul 2022 – Dec 20221.6 ppb
Jan 2022 – Jun 20221.2 ppb
Jul 2021 – Dec 20212.2 ppb
Jan 2021 – Jun 20211.8 ppb
Jul 2020 – Dec 20202.5 ppb
Jan 2020 – Jun 20202.3 ppb
Jul 2019 – Dec 20191.4 ppb
Jan 2018 – Dec 20182.3 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
8
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
11
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese0.83 ppb300 ppb3 of 8UCMR 4 (2018)
Chromium-61 ppb–15 of 15UCMR 3 (2015)
Molybdenum4.8 ppb40 ppb15 of 15UCMR 3 (2015)
Chlorate1,100 ppb210 ppb11 of 15UCMR 3 (2015)
Strontium0.45 ppm1.5 ppm15 of 15UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

Thornton

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 80023, 80221, 80229, 80233, 80241, 80260, 80602

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Thornton tap water safe to drink?

Most of Thornton gets its water from City of Thornton. City of Thornton has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Thornton water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of City of Thornton found 8 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Thornton water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of Thornton is 2.3 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2025. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.