Tap Water Results

Is Castle Rock, CO tap water safe?

Supplied by Town of Castle Rock · serves 110,298 people (27,865 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID CO0118010

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Parker Water & Sanitation District, Castle Pines Village Metropolitan District, Pinery Waterworks District. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit2 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 25 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level2 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Jun 2026. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 5 entry points tested May 2023 to Aug 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
1.28 ppt5.1 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
1.93 ppt4.7 pptnoneDetected, no limit

29 PFAS tested, 2 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 11 of 12 samples. Highest result 25 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 2 ppb lead (Jan 2026 – Jun 2026). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 4 ppb (Jun 2020).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2026 – Jun 20262 ppb
Jul 2025 – Dec 20252 ppb
Jan 2025 – Jun 20252 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jul 2024 – Dec 20242 ppb
Jan 2024 – Jun 20242 ppb
Jul 2023 – Dec 20232 ppb
Jan 2023 – Jun 20232 ppb
Jul 2022 – Dec 20223 ppb
Jan 2022 – Jun 20222 ppb
Jul 2021 – Dec 20212.8 ppb
Jan 2021 – Jun 20212 ppb
Jul 2020 – Dec 20202 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
9
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
19
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese6.8 ppb300 ppb5 of 12UCMR 4 (2020)
Strontium0.5 ppm1.5 ppm20 of 20UCMR 3 (2015)
Molybdenum1.1 ppb40 ppb6 of 20UCMR 3 (2015)
Chlorate660 ppb210 ppb20 of 20UCMR 3 (2015)
Chromium-60.92 ppb–16 of 20UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

Castle Rock

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 80104, 80108, 80109

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Castle Rock tap water safe to drink?

Most of Castle Rock gets its water from Town of Castle Rock. Town of Castle Rock has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Castle Rock water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Town of Castle Rock found 2 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Castle Rock water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Town of Castle Rock is 2 ppb, for the period ending Jun 2026. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.