Tap Water Results

Is North Port, FL tap water safe?

Supplied by North Port Utilities · serves 61,163 people (28,581 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID FL6580651

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Peace River Regional Water Plant. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit6 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lead
Below action level3.4 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2025. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 4 entry points tested Jan 2024 to Dec 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
One sample above limit
Limit 4 ppt
3.9 ppt
98% of the limit
5.5 ppt4 pptOne sample above limit
PFOS
One sample above limit
Limit 4 ppt
1.03 ppt
26% of the limit
4.1 ppt4 pptOne sample above limit
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.00310.00341Detected, below limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
6.1 ppt6.7 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
6.77 ppt7.7 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
3.47 ppt4.1 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
5.22 ppt6.4 pptnoneDetected, no limit

29 PFAS tested, 6 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 14 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 3.4 ppb lead (Jan 2025 – Dec 2025). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 5 ppb (Dec 2020).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2025 – Dec 20253.4 ppb
Jul 2024 – Dec 20241.9 ppb
Jan 2024 – Jun 20243.3 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2023 – Dec 20231.5 ppb
Jan 2020 – Dec 20205 ppb
Jan 2017 – Dec 20172 ppb
Jan 2014 – Jun 20140 ppb
Jul 2013 – Dec 20132 ppb
Jan 2010 – Dec 20103.2 ppb
Jan 2007 – Dec 20075 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20045 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20042 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
3
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now (plus 1 paperwork)
10
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

1 unresolved monitoring or reporting violation: Revised Total Coliform Rule.

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese27.2 ppb300 ppb4 of 4UCMR 4 (2018)
Chlorate872 ppb210 ppb8 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Chromium-60.035 ppb–2 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Strontium2.64 ppm1.5 ppm8 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Vanadium0.84 ppb21 ppb7 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Molybdenum12.5 ppb40 ppb5 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

North Port

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 34286, 34287, 34288, 34290, 34291, 34293

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is North Port tap water safe to drink?

Most of North Port gets its water from North Port Utilities. North Port Utilities has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does North Port water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of North Port Utilities found 6 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in North Port water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for North Port Utilities is 3.4 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2025. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.