Tap Water Results

Spalding County Water System water quality

Griffin, GA · serves 40,430 people (12,383 connections) · Purchased surface water · Local government · EPA ID GA2550036

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Clayton County Water Authority, Griffin Water System. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

PFAS above the 2024 federal limits. Systems have until 2029 to meet the PFAS limits.

Is it an emergency? No: PFAS limits are about years of exposure, not a glass of water, and nothing in EPA's data calls for you to stop drinking the water today. If your utility ever issues a boil-water or do-not-drink notice, follow it.

PFAS
Above limitPFOA, PFOS above the federal limit in EPA's 2023–2025 testing (PFOA 5.3 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, PFOS 7.6 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, where ppt = parts per trillion).
Lead
No resultsNo lead and copper results in EPA's national database.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do
  • Pregnant, or mixing baby formula with tap water? Babies drink more water for their size, so PFAS exposure matters more for them. Consider bottled water or a filter certified for PFAS for formula, and ask your doctor. Health effects.
  • To lower your PFAS exposure now, a home filter certified for PFAS reduction works (reverse osmosis, or activated carbon certified to NSF/ANSI 53 or 58). Filters for these results.
  • Built before 1986, or not sure what your service line is made of? Check your service line and test your tap. Utility data can't show your pipes.
  • Tested your own tap? Compare your result with these numbers. Moving? Compare this system with another.
  • Read Spalding County Water System's annual water quality report (Consumer Confidence Report). It lists every regulated contaminant tested and is usually on the utility's website or mailed with your bill, and you can also request it at (770) 467-4777. EPA: how to find it.

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 1 entry point tested Feb 2024 to Nov 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
5.3 ppt
1.32× the limit
10 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFOS
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
7.6 ppt
1.9× the limit
13 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFHxS
One sample above limit
Limit 10 ppt
9.38 ppt
94% of the limit
18 ppt10 pptOne sample above limit
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.941.81Detected, below limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
5.58 ppt8.2 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
1.93 ppt7.7 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
10.6 ppt20 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
13.1 ppt23 pptnoneDetected, no limit
PFHpA
Detected, no limit
3.58 ppt7.2 pptnoneDetected, no limit
6:2 FTS
Detected, no limit
1.3 ppt5.2 pptnoneDetected, no limit

For context: the PFOA average is higher than at 93% of the Georgia systems EPA tested and the PFOS average is higher than at 96% of the Georgia systems EPA tested.

29 PFAS tested, 9 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 4 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

No lead and copper results reported to EPA's national database for this system.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
1
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
5
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese1.7 ppb300 ppb4 of 4UCMR 4 (2018)
Chromium-60.1 ppb–8 of 8UCMR 3 (2013)
Chlorate400 ppb210 ppb8 of 8UCMR 3 (2013)
Vanadium0.6 ppb21 ppb5 of 8UCMR 3 (2013)
Strontium0.059 ppm1.5 ppm8 of 8UCMR 3 (2013)

Where it serves

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 30223, 30224

Questions

Is Spalding County Water System water safe to drink?

Spalding County Water System has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found PFAS above the 2024 federal limits, which systems must meet by 2029. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Spalding County Water System water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Spalding County Water System found 9 PFAS at least once. The highest entry-point averages were above the federal limit for PFOA and PFOS: PFOA 5.3 ppt, PFOS 7.6 ppt (limit 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt for the others).

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.