Tap Water Results

Is Waterloo, IA tap water safe?

Supplied by Waterloo Water Works · serves 69,504 people (27,430 connections) · Groundwater · EPA ID IA0790074

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit4 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 20 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level1.8 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2025. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 9 entry points tested Feb 2023 to Sep 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Rounds to the limit
Limit 10 ppt
11.4 ppt
1.14× the limit
13 ppt10 pptRounds to the limit
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Rounds to the limit
Limit 1
1.141.31Rounds to the limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
3.2 ppt3.2 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
1.55 ppt3.1 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
4.5 ppt4.8 pptnoneDetected, no limit

Why "rounds to the limit"? the PFHxS average (11.4 ppt) and the Hazard Index (1.14) are slightly above the number on paper, but EPA compares results after rounding to the limit's precision (4.4 ppt rounds to 4), so they meet the limit as EPA applies it. Close enough to the limit to be worth watching.

29 PFAS tested, 4 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 10 of 18 samples. Highest result 20 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 1.8 ppb lead (Jan 2025 – Dec 2025). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 7.9 ppb (Dec 2017).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2025 – Dec 20251.8 ppb
Jan 2024 – Dec 20242 ppb
Jul 2023 – Dec 20231.2 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2023 – Jun 20231.4 ppb
Jan 2021 – Dec 20213 ppb
Jan 2020 – Dec 20205.4 ppb
Jan 2019 – Jun 20192.5 ppb
Jul 2018 – Dec 20185 ppb
Jan 2015 – Dec 20177.9 ppb
Jan 2012 – Dec 20144.6 ppb
Jan 2009 – Dec 201114.8 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 20086 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
0
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
23
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese24.7 ppb300 ppb7 of 15UCMR 4 (2019)
Molybdenum1.62 ppb40 ppb6 of 20UCMR 3 (2014)
Strontium1.17 ppm1.5 ppm20 of 20UCMR 3 (2014)
Chromium-61.75 ppb–15 of 20UCMR 3 (2014)
Chlorate671 ppb210 ppb19 of 20UCMR 3 (2014)
Vanadium0.64 ppb21 ppb13 of 20UCMR 3 (2014)
1,4-Dioxane0.14 ppb0.35 ppb1 of 18UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Waterloo

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 50701, 50702, 50703, 50704, 50705, 50706, 50707

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Waterloo tap water safe to drink?

Most of Waterloo gets its water from Waterloo Water Works. Waterloo Water Works has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Waterloo water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Waterloo Water Works found 4 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Waterloo water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Waterloo Water Works is 1.8 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2025. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.