Tap Water Results

Is Joliet, IL tap water safe?

Supplied by Joliet Water System · serves 160,000 people (49,000 connections) · Groundwater · EPA ID IL1970450

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Joliet gets its water from Joliet Water System. Parts of the city are served by 11 smaller systems: Southeast Joliet Sanitary District (2,000 people), Crystal Lawns Addition Improvement Association (1,435 people), Stateville Correctional Center Water System (992 people), Lakewood Shores Improvement Association (868 people) and 7 more. Your water bill names your system.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 22 samples (2023–2025).
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 54.7 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level6.53 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Jun 2026. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved1 health-based violation since 2016, most recently Oct 2024.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 11 entry points tested Feb 2025 to Aug 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 22 of 22 samples. Highest result 54.7 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 6.53 ppb lead (Jan 2026 – Jun 2026). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 9.03 ppb (Dec 2025).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2026 – Jun 20266.53 ppb
Jul 2025 – Dec 20259.03 ppb
Jan 2025 – Dec 20250 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2025 – Jun 20258.7 ppb
Jul 2024 – Dec 20247.77 ppb
Jan 2024 – Jun 20244.73 ppb
Jul 2023 – Dec 20235.52 ppb
Jan 2023 – Jun 20234.2 ppb
Jul 2022 – Dec 20224.39 ppb
Jan 2019 – Dec 20217.23 ppb
Jan 2018 – Dec 20188.18 ppb
Jan 2015 – Dec 20177.69 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

1
Health-based since 2016
11
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
65
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Oct 2024The system did not publish the required inventory of lead service lines (due October 2024). It says nothing about lead levels in the water.
EPA record: Lead and copper rule revisions · LSL Inventory
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese99.5 ppb300 ppb20 of 22UCMR 4 (2019)
Strontium3.1 ppm1.5 ppm24 of 24UCMR 3 (2013)
Molybdenum2.6 ppb40 ppb2 of 24UCMR 3 (2013)
1,4-Dioxane0.15 ppb0.35 ppb2 of 22UCMR 3 (2013)
Chlorate500 ppb210 ppb23 of 24UCMR 3 (2013)

Where it serves

Joliet

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 60403, 60404, 60410, 60431, 60432, 60433, 60435, 60436, 60441, 60447, 60451, 60586

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Joliet tap water safe to drink?

Most of Joliet gets its water from Joliet Water System. Joliet Water System had 1 health-based violation since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Joliet water have PFAS?

EPA tested Joliet Water System for 29 PFAS between Feb 2025 and Aug 2025 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).

What is the lead level in Joliet water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Joliet Water System is 6.53 ppb, for the period ending Jun 2026. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.