Tap Water Results

Is Anderson, IN tap water safe?

Supplied by Anderson Water Department · serves 55,212 people (23,279 connections) · Groundwater under influence of surface water · EPA ID IN5248002

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Anderson gets its water from Anderson Water Department. Parts of the city are served by a smaller system: Edgewood Water Department (2,053 people). Your water bill names your system.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit1 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lead
Below action level1.4 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2025. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved2 health-based violations since 2016, most recently Jan 2026. One required an urgent public notice within 24 hours (the kind behind boil-water notices), most recently Dec 2024. What to do if you get a notice.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 2 entry points tested Oct 2024 to Jul 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
One sample above limit
Limit 4 ppt
1.03 ppt
26% of the limit
4.1 ppt4 pptOne sample above limit
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 1 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 6 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 1.4 ppb lead (Jan 2023 – Dec 2025). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 4.8 ppb (Dec 2019).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2023 – Dec 20251.4 ppb
Jan 2020 – Dec 20222.8 ppb
Jan 2017 – Dec 20194.8 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2014 – Dec 20162.3 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 20130.5 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20100.5 ppb
Jan 2007 – Dec 20091.4 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20060.9 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 20034 ppb
Jan 1997 – Dec 19976.2 ppb
Jan 1996 – Dec 199610 ppb
Jan 1995 – Jun 19956 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

2
Health-based since 2016
4
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
45
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Jan 2026The water chemistry that keeps lead from dissolving out of pipes was outside the range the state set.
EPA record: Lead and Copper Rule · WQP Entry Point/Tap Treatment Technique Non-Compliance (limit TT )
Archived
Archived
Dec 2024E. coli was confirmed in the water. E. coli means the water may have been contaminated with sewage or animal waste.
Urgent public notice required What that means
EPA record: Revised Total Coliform Rule · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, E. coli (RTCR)
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese0.61 ppb300 ppb2 of 6UCMR 4 (2019)
Molybdenum10.4 ppb40 ppb10 of 10UCMR 3 (2014)
Chlorate22.4 ppb210 ppb1 of 10UCMR 3 (2014)
Chromium-60.13 ppb–2 of 10UCMR 3 (2014)
Strontium0.64 ppm1.5 ppm10 of 10UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Anderson

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 46011, 46013, 46016

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Anderson tap water safe to drink?

Most of Anderson gets its water from Anderson Water Department. Anderson Water Department had 2 health-based violations since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Anderson water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Anderson Water Department found 1 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Anderson water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Anderson Water Department is 1.4 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2025. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.