Tap Water Results

New Design – Frederick County Water System water quality

Frederick, MD · serves 74,911 people (22,869 connections) · Surface water · Local government · EPA ID MD0100030

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Summary

No limits exceeded in the data EPA has, but the record is incomplete: no lead results since 2019.

PFAS
Detected, below limit1 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lead
Out of dateEPA's national database has no lead results for this system since 2019 (then 3 ppb, 90th percentile). Systems this size normally test every one to three years, so this most likely means newer results were not reported to EPA, not that testing stopped. Ask the utility for its latest results.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 1 entry point tested Jan 2025 to Oct 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
0.82 ppt3.3 pptnoneDetected, no limit

29 PFAS tested, 1 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 4 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 3 ppb lead (Jul 2019 – Dec 2019). No results since 2019

This is the newest lead result in EPA's national database. Utilities report lead results to their state, and states pass them to EPA. Gaps like this usually mean the newer results did not reach EPA's database, not that the utility stopped testing. Results this old may not reflect the water today. Ask the utility or your state drinking water program for the latest lead monitoring.

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jul 2019 – Dec 20193 ppb
Jan 2019 – Jun 20192 ppb
Jan 2015 – Dec 20172 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2012 – Dec 20140 ppb
Jan 2009 – Dec 20110 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 20084 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20054 ppb
Jan 2000 – Dec 20022 ppb
Jan 1997 – Dec 19993 ppb
Jan 1996 – Dec 19984 ppb
Jan 1995 – Dec 19955 ppb
Jan 1994 – Dec 19945 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
3
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
6
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese63.4 ppb300 ppb1 of 4UCMR 4 (2020)
Chromium-60.4 ppb–12 of 12UCMR 3 (2014)
Strontium0.32 ppm1.5 ppm12 of 12UCMR 3 (2014)
Chlorate467 ppb210 ppb12 of 12UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Frederick, Green Valley, Ballenger Creek, Linganore, Point of Rocks

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 21701, 21703, 21704, 21710, 21754, 21770, 21774, 21777, 21790

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is New Design – Frederick County Water System water safe to drink?

New Design – Frederick County Water System has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does New Design – Frederick County Water System water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of New Design – Frederick County Water System found 1 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in New Design – Frederick County Water System water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for New Design – Frederick County Water System is 3 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2019, which is more than five years old. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.