Tap Water Results

Is Lansing, MI tap water safe?

Supplied by Lansing Board of Water & Light · serves 166,000 people (56,159 connections) · Groundwater · EPA ID MI0003760

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Lansing gets its water from Lansing Board of Water & Light. Parts of the city are served by a smaller system: Lansing Township Water System (5,500 people). Your water bill names your system.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 4 samples (2023–2025).
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 19.6 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2024 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 2 entry points tested Feb 2024 to Aug 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

Michigan has its own PFAS limits. PFNA 6 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected), PFOA 8 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected), PFHxA 400000 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected), PFOS 16 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected), PFHxS 51 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected), PFBS 420 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected), HFPO-DA 370 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected). State compliance is judged on the state's own sampling, so ask the utility or the state program whether it meets them.

29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 3 of 4 samples. Highest result 19.6 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2024 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 1.6 ppb (Dec 2020).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2024 – now (in progress)0 ppb
Jan 2021 – Dec 20230 ppb
Jan 2018 – Dec 20201.6 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2015 – Dec 20171.1 ppb
Jan 2012 – Dec 20147.78 ppb
Jan 2009 – Dec 20115.96 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20107.3 ppb
Jan 2007 – Dec 200911.7 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 200815 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 200511.7 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 200213 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 200113 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
3
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
7
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese0.67 ppb300 ppb4 of 4UCMR 4 (2020)
Molybdenum1.2 ppb40 ppb6 of 8UCMR 3 (2015)
Vanadium0.4 ppb21 ppb8 of 8UCMR 3 (2015)
Chlorate330 ppb210 ppb8 of 8UCMR 3 (2015)
Chromium-60.24 ppb–8 of 8UCMR 3 (2015)
Strontium0.21 ppm1.5 ppm8 of 8UCMR 3 (2015)
1,4-Dioxane0.14 ppb0.35 ppb2 of 4UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

Lansing

27 ZIP codes the system reported serving

48808, 48820, 48821, 48823, 48824, 48837, 48840, 48842, 48854, 48864, 48901, 48906, 48909, 48910, 48911, 48912, 48915, 48916, 48917, 48919, 48922, 48924, 48929, 48930, 48933, 48937, 48951

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Lansing tap water safe to drink?

Most of Lansing gets its water from Lansing Board of Water & Light. Lansing Board of Water & Light has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Lansing water have PFAS?

EPA tested Lansing Board of Water & Light for 29 PFAS between Feb 2024 and Aug 2024 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).

What is the lead level in Lansing water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Lansing Board of Water & Light is 0 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2024 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.