Tap Water Results

Is St. Paul, MN tap water safe?

Supplied by Saint Paul Regional Water Services · serves 392,529 people (94,778 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID MN1620026

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit2 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lead
Below action level10 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Jun 2026. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved1 health-based violation since 2016, most recently Apr 2022.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 1 entry point tested Sep 2023 to Sep 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
14.6 ppt20.2 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
1.5 ppt3 pptnoneDetected, no limit

29 PFAS tested, 2 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 4 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 10 ppb lead (Jan 2026 – Jun 2026). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 17 ppb (Dec 2023).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2026 – Jun 202610 ppb
Jan 2025 – Dec 20258 ppb
Jul 2024 – Dec 202412 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2024 – Jun 20249 ppb
Jan 2023 – Dec 202317 ppb
Jan 2018 – Dec 202012 ppb
Jan 2015 – Dec 201711 ppb
Jan 2012 – Dec 201410 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 201113 ppb
Jan 2010 – Dec 201012 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 200811 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 200511 ppb

Lead service lines: Saint Paul Regional Water Services's inventory lists 17,000 lead, 4,500 of unknown material (as of 2026). It reports 4,500 lead lines replaced since 2022. Figures are approximate, as the utility published them.

Look up your address · Source (the utility, collected by us on Nov 14, 2026, not EPA data) · Checking your own line

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

1
Health-based since 2016
9
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
12
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Apr 2022The water chemistry that keeps lead from dissolving out of pipes was outside the range the state set.
EPA record: Lead and Copper Rule · WQP Entry Point/Tap Treatment Technique Non-Compliance (limit TT )
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Strontium0.078 ppm1.5 ppm8 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Chlorate29.1 ppb210 ppb2 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Vanadium0.58 ppb21 ppb8 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Chromium-60.39 ppb–8 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Molybdenum1.2 ppb40 ppb4 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

St. Paul, Woodbury, Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, Maplewood, Apple Valley, Roseville, Oakdale, Shoreview, Mendota Heights, Arden Hills, White Bear Lake, North Oaks, West St. Paul, Mahtomedi, Mendota

32 ZIP codes the system reported serving

55077, 55101, 55102, 55103, 55104, 55105, 55106, 55107, 55108, 55109, 55110, 55111, 55112, 55113, 55114, 55115, 55116, 55117, 55118, 55119, 55120, 55121, 55122, 55123, 55124, 55125, 55126, 55127, 55128, 55129, 55130, 55150

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is St. Paul tap water safe to drink?

Most of St. Paul gets its water from Saint Paul Regional Water Services. Saint Paul Regional Water Services had 1 health-based violation since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does St. Paul water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Saint Paul Regional Water Services found 2 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in St. Paul water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Saint Paul Regional Water Services is 10 ppb, for the period ending Jun 2026. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.