City of Columbia Utilities water quality
Columbia, MO · serves 126,254 people (50,207 connections) · Groundwater · Local government · EPA ID MO3010181
Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it
Buys water from Boone County Public Water Supply District 9. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.
Summary
No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.
- PFAS
- Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 2 samples (2023–2025).
- Lithium
- Above screening levelHighest result 21.4 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
- Lead
- Below action level2.1 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2025. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
- Violations
- None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
- Built before 1986, or not sure what your service line is made of? Check your service line and test your tap. Utility data can't show your pipes.
- Tested your own tap? Compare your result with these numbers. Moving? Compare this system with another.
- Read City of Columbia Utilities's annual water quality report (Consumer Confidence Report). It lists every regulated contaminant tested and is usually on the utility's website or mailed with your bill, and you can also request it at (573) 874-7264. EPA: how to find it.
PFAS (“forever chemicals”)
EPA UCMR 5: 1 entry point tested Jun 2024 to Nov 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.
| Contaminant | Highest average |
|---|---|
| PFOA Not detected Limit 4 ppt | – |
| PFOS Not detected Limit 4 ppt | – |
| PFHxS Not detected Limit 10 ppt | – |
| PFNA Not detected Limit 10 ppt | – |
| HFPO-DA (GenX) Not detected Limit 10 ppt | – |
| Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit) Not detected Limit 1 | – |
| PFBS Not detected Guideline 2,000 ppt | – |
| PFBA Not detected Guideline 6,000 ppt | – |
| PFHxA Not detected Guideline 3,000 ppt | – |
29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.
Lithium
Detected in 2 of 2 samples. Highest result 21.4 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.
Lead and copper
Latest 90th percentile: 2.1 ppb lead (Jul 2025 – Dec 2025). Below action level
Highest since 2016: 3.25 ppb (Dec 2023).
| Monitoring period | Lead (90th pct.) |
|---|---|
| Jul 2025 – Dec 2025 | 2.1 ppb |
| Jan 2025 – Jun 2025 | 1.57 ppb |
| Jul 2023 – Dec 2023 | 3.25 ppb |
Earlier results (9)
| Jan 2023 – Jun 2023 | 2.64 ppb |
| Jan 2017 – Dec 2019 | 3.06 ppb |
| Jan 2014 – Dec 2016 | 2.14 ppb |
| Jan 2011 – Dec 2013 | 2.63 ppb |
| Jan 2008 – Dec 2010 | 1.92 ppb |
| Jan 2005 – Dec 2007 | 2.2 ppb |
| Jan 2004 – Dec 2004 | 7.08 ppb |
| Jan 2001 – Dec 2001 | 0 ppb |
| Jan 1996 – Dec 1998 | 0 ppb |
Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.
Violations
1 unresolved monitoring or reporting violation: Lead and copper rule revisions.
Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.
Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)
| Contaminant | Highest | Guideline |
|---|---|---|
| Manganese | 11.6 ppb | 300 ppb |
| Vanadium | 1.05 ppb | 21 ppb |
| Strontium | 0.18 ppm | 1.5 ppm |
| Molybdenum | 2.44 ppb | 40 ppb |
| Chromium-6 | 1.3 ppb | – |
Where it serves
ZIP codes the system reported serving: 65201, 65202, 65203, 65205, 65211, 65212, 65215, 65216, 65217, 65218, 65299
Nearby utilities
- Camdenton Public Water System Camdenton · 68 mi · PFAS above limit
- St James Public Water System St. James · 76 mi · PFAS above limit
- St Robert Public Water System St. Robert · 78 mi · PFAS above limit
- St Charles County Public Water Supply District 2 O'Fallon · 87 mi
- St Peters Public Water System St. Peters · 93 mi · PFAS above limit
- Missouri American Water – St Louis St Charles Counties St. Charles · 98 mi
Questions
Is City of Columbia Utilities water safe to drink?
City of Columbia Utilities has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.
Does City of Columbia Utilities water have PFAS?
EPA tested City of Columbia Utilities for 29 PFAS between Jun 2024 and Nov 2024 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).
What is the lead level in City of Columbia Utilities water?
The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of Columbia Utilities is 2.1 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2025. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.
Check these numbers yourself
Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:
- EPA's own report for MO3010181: violations, enforcement and inspections, straight from EPA.
- EPA UCMR 5 data: the PFAS and lithium results (search the file for PWSID MO3010181).
- EPA SDWIS download: the lead results, population and violation records we use.
- The utility's annual water quality report (Consumer Confidence Report): ask City of Columbia Utilities at (573) 874-7264, or see EPA's guide to finding it.
Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.
Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.