Tap Water Results

Is Charlotte, NC tap water safe?

Supplied by Charlotte Water · serves 1.2 million people (337,614 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID NC0160010

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Charlotte gets its water from Charlotte Water. Parts of the city are served by 20 smaller systems: Lamplighter South-Danby Water System (3,297 people), Bradfield Farms S/D Water System (3,015 people), Wildwood Green/McIlwaine Water System (681 people), River Pointe Estates Water System (500 people) and 16 more. Your water bill names your system.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit2 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2025. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 5 entry points tested Aug 2023 to May 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
2.43 ppt9.7 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
0.85 ppt3.4 pptnoneDetected, no limit

29 PFAS tested, 2 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 20 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2023 – Dec 2025). Below action level

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2023 – Dec 20250 ppb
Jan 2020 – Dec 20220 ppb
Jan 2017 – Dec 20190 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2014 – Dec 20160 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 20136 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20100 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20070 ppb
Jul 2004 – Dec 20040 ppb
Jul 2003 – Dec 20030 ppb
Jul 2002 – Dec 20024 ppb
Jan 2000 – Jun 20008 ppb
Jul 1992 – Dec 19924 ppb

Lead service lines: Charlotte Water's inventory lists 0 lead, 66 galvanized lines that need replacing, 0 of unknown material out of 333,871 service lines (as of 2024-10-14). Counted by us from the utility's or state's published line-by-line inventory data.

Look up your address · Source (the utility, collected by us on Nov 14, 2026, not EPA data) · Checking your own line

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
0
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
11
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese121 ppb300 ppb20 of 20UCMR 4 (2018)
Vanadium0.75 ppb21 ppb24 of 24UCMR 3 (2014)
Strontium0.036 ppm1.5 ppm24 of 24UCMR 3 (2014)
Chromium-60.12 ppb–24 of 24UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Charlotte

81 ZIP codes the system reported serving

28031, 28035, 28036, 28070, 28078, 28104, 28105, 28106, 28134, 28201, 28202, 28204, 28205, 28206, 28207, 28208, 28209, 28210, 28211, 28212, 28213, 28214, 28215, 28216, 28217, 28218, 28219, 28220, 28221, 28222, 28223, 28224, 28226, 28227, 28228, 28229, 28230, 28231, 28232, 28233, 28234, 28235, 28236, 28237, 28241, 28242, 28243, 28244, 28246, 28247, 28253, 28254, 28255, 28256, 28258, 28260, 28262, 28263, 28265, 28266, 28269, 28270, 28271, 28272, 28273, 28274, 28275, 28277, 28278, 28280, 28281, 28282, 28284, 28285, 28287, 28288, 28289, 28290, 28296, 28297, 28299

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Charlotte tap water safe to drink?

Most of Charlotte gets its water from Charlotte Water. Charlotte Water has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Charlotte water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Charlotte Water found 2 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Charlotte water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Charlotte Water is 0 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2025. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.