Tap Water Results

Is Fargo, ND tap water safe?

Supplied by City of Fargo · serves 120,762 people (30,766 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID ND0900336

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Fargo gets its water from City of Fargo. Parts of the city are served by a smaller system: Cass Rural Water District Fargo (4,242 people). Your water bill names your system.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 4 samples (2023–2025).
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 40 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level1.89 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2024 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved2 health-based violations since 2016, most recently Jan 2018.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 1 entry point tested Jan 2023 to Oct 2023. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 4 of 4 samples. Highest result 40 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 1.89 ppb lead (Jan 2024 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 3 ppb (Dec 2019).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2024 – now (in progress)1.89 ppb
Jan 2023 – Dec 20232.34 ppb
Jan 2022 – Dec 20222.04 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2021 – Dec 20212.43 ppb
Jan 2020 – Jun 20202.88 ppb
Jul 2019 – Dec 20193 ppb
Jan 2015 – Dec 20173 ppb
Jan 2012 – Dec 20143 ppb
Jan 2009 – Dec 20115 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 20084 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20055 ppb
Jan 2000 – Dec 20025 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

2
Health-based since 2016
0
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
9
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Oct 2017 – Jan 2018
2 times
The running annual average for Bromate was above the legal limit.
EPA record: Bromate · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average · measured 0.011 mg/l (limit 0.010 mg/L)
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese2.01 ppb300 ppb2 of 4UCMR 4 (2018)
Molybdenum3.55 ppb40 ppb8 of 8UCMR 3 (2013)
Vanadium1.23 ppb21 ppb8 of 8UCMR 3 (2013)
Chromium-61.11 ppb–8 of 8UCMR 3 (2013)
Strontium0.26 ppm1.5 ppm8 of 8UCMR 3 (2013)

Where it serves

Fargo

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 58102, 58103, 58104, 58105, 58106, 58107, 58108, 58109, 58121, 58122, 58124, 58125, 58126

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Fargo tap water safe to drink?

Most of Fargo gets its water from City of Fargo. City of Fargo had 2 health-based violations since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Fargo water have PFAS?

EPA tested City of Fargo for 29 PFAS between Jan 2023 and Oct 2023 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).

What is the lead level in Fargo water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of Fargo is 1.89 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2024 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.