Tap Water Results

Is Newark, NJ tap water safe?

Supplied by Newark Water Department · serves 294,274 people (36,402 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID NJ0714001

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Belleville Water Dept, N.J.D.W.S.C. – Wanaque North Water System. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

PFAS above the 2024 federal limits. Systems have until 2029 to meet the PFAS limits.

Is it an emergency? No: PFAS limits are about years of exposure, not a glass of water, and nothing in EPA's data calls for you to stop drinking the water today. If your utility ever issues a boil-water or do-not-drink notice, follow it.

PFAS
Above limitPFOA above the federal limit in EPA's 2023–2025 testing (PFOA 4.8 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, where ppt = parts per trillion).
Lead
Below action level4.03 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2026 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved20 health-based violations since 2016, most recently Jul 2022. 3 required an urgent public notice within 24 hours (the kind behind boil-water notices), most recently Sep 2020. What to do if you get a notice.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 2 entry points tested Feb 2023 to Nov 2023. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
4.8 ppt
1.2× the limit
5.3 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

New Jersey has its own PFAS limits. PFOA 14 ppt (this system's highest average: 4.8 ppt), PFOS 13 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected), PFNA 13 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected). State compliance is judged on the state's own sampling, so ask the utility or the state program whether it meets them.

For context: the PFOA average is higher than at 57% of the New Jersey systems EPA tested.

29 PFAS tested, 1 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 8 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 4.03 ppb lead (Jan 2026 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 57 ppb (Jun 2019).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2026 – now (in progress)4.03 ppb
Jan 2025 – Dec 20250 ppb
Jan 2024 – Dec 20240 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jul 2023 – Dec 20230 ppb
Jan 2023 – Jun 20234.1 ppb
Jul 2022 – Dec 20224.81 ppb
Jan 2022 – Jun 20224.44 ppb
Jul 2021 – Dec 20219.75 ppb
Jan 2021 – Jun 20216.6 ppb
Jul 2020 – Dec 202013 ppb
Jan 2020 – Jun 202013.9 ppb
Jul 2019 – Dec 201931 ppb

Lead service lines: Newark Water Department publishes a service line inventory where you can look up what your line is made of. It doesn't publish summary counts.

Look up your address · Source (the utility, collected by us on Nov 14, 2026, not EPA data) · Checking your own line

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

20
Health-based since 2016
4
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
122
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Jul 2022The water chemistry that keeps lead from dissolving out of pipes was outside the range the state set.
EPA record: Lead and Copper Rule · WQP Entry Point/Tap Treatment Technique Non-Compliance (limit TT )
Resolved
Resolved
Sep 2020The water was cloudier than allowed at least once. Cloudiness can shield germs from disinfection.
Urgent public notice required What that means
EPA record: Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule · Single Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR) (limit )
Resolved
Resolved
Jan 2016 – Sep 2020
3 times
A required step to remove or kill germs (filtration, disinfection or fixing a contaminated well) was not done properly.
EPA record: Surface Water Treatment Rule · Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR) (limit )
Resolved
Resolved
Jul 2018 – Jan 2020
7 times
The running annual average for Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) was above the legal limit.
EPA record: Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average · measured 0.066 mg/l (limit 0.060 mg/L)
Resolved
Resolved
Jan 2016 – Apr 2019
4 times
The running annual average for TTHM was above the legal limit.
EPA record: TTHM · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average · measured 0.093 mg/l (limit 0.080 mg/L)
Resolved
Resolved
Sep 2018 – Mar 2019
2 times
After high lead results, the system did not give customers the required information about lead.
EPA record: Lead and Copper Rule · Public Education (limit TT )
Resolved
Resolved
Nov 2018 – Dec 2018
2 times
The water was too cloudy too often in a month. Cloudiness can shield germs from disinfection.
Urgent public notice required What that means
EPA record: Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule · Monthly Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR) (limit )
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese121 ppb300 ppb8 of 8UCMR 4 (2019)
Chromium-60.056 ppb–7 of 8UCMR 3 (2015)
Strontium0.051 ppm1.5 ppm8 of 8UCMR 3 (2015)
Chlorate47 ppb210 ppb1 of 2UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

Newark, Bloomfield, East Orange, Belleville, Irvington, Hillside

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 07003, 07017, 07102, 07109, 07110, 07201, 07435, 07440, 07470

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Newark tap water safe to drink?

Most of Newark gets its water from Newark Water Department. Newark Water Department had 20 health-based violations since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found PFAS above the 2024 federal limits, which systems must meet by 2029. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Newark water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Newark Water Department found 1 PFAS at least once. The highest entry-point averages were above the federal limit for PFOA: PFOA 4.8 ppt (limit 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt for the others).

What is the lead level in Newark water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Newark Water Department is 4.03 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2026 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.