Tap Water Results

Clinton Water Dept water quality

Clinton, NJ · serves 12,500 people (4,600 connections) · Groundwater · Local government · EPA ID NJ1005001

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Summary

PFAS above the 2024 federal limits. Systems have until 2029 to meet the PFAS limits.

Is it an emergency? No: PFAS limits are about years of exposure, not a glass of water, and nothing in EPA's data calls for you to stop drinking the water today. If your utility ever issues a boil-water or do-not-drink notice, follow it.

PFAS
Above limitPFOA, PFOS above the federal limit in EPA's 2023–2025 testing (PFOA 7.9 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, PFOS 9.7 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, where ppt = parts per trillion).
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 19.3 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level6.8 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2024 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do
  • Pregnant, or mixing baby formula with tap water? Babies drink more water for their size, so PFAS exposure matters more for them. Consider bottled water or a filter certified for PFAS for formula, and ask your doctor. Health effects.
  • To lower your PFAS exposure now, a home filter certified for PFAS reduction works (reverse osmosis, or activated carbon certified to NSF/ANSI 53 or 58). Filters for these results.
  • Built before 1986, or not sure what your service line is made of? Check your service line and test your tap. Utility data can't show your pipes.
  • Tested your own tap? Compare your result with these numbers. Moving? Compare this system with another.
  • Read Clinton Water Dept's annual water quality report (Consumer Confidence Report). It lists every regulated contaminant tested and is usually on the utility's website or mailed with your bill, and you can also request it at (908) 735-2265. EPA: how to find it.

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 10 entry points tested Sep 2023 to Mar 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
7.9 ppt
1.98× the limit
9 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFOS
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
9.7 ppt
2.42× the limit
12.2 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.00280.00291Detected, below limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
5.55 ppt5.9 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
5.65 ppt6 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
7.75 ppt7.8 pptnoneDetected, no limit

New Jersey has its own PFAS limits. PFOA 14 ppt (this system's highest average: 7.9 ppt), PFOS 13 ppt (this system's highest average: 9.7 ppt), PFNA 13 ppt (this system's highest average: not detected). State compliance is judged on the state's own sampling, so ask the utility or the state program whether it meets them.

For context: the PFOA average is higher than at 76% of the New Jersey systems EPA tested and the PFOS average is higher than at 94% of the New Jersey systems EPA tested.

29 PFAS tested, 5 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 4 of 20 samples. Highest result 19.3 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 6.8 ppb lead (Jan 2024 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2024 – now (in progress)6.8 ppb
Jan 2021 – Dec 20234.6 ppb
Jan 2018 – Dec 20204.9 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2015 – Dec 20175.1 ppb
Jan 2012 – Dec 20146.4 ppb
Jan 2009 – Dec 20116.8 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 20084.9 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20076.6 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20056.6 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20045.3 ppb
Jan 1999 – Jun 19998.5 ppb
Jul 1996 – Dec 19967 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
50
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now (plus 1 paperwork)
438
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

1 unresolved monitoring or reporting violation: E. coli.

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese52.9 ppb300 ppb16 of 20UCMR 4 (2019)
Strontium0.82 ppm1.5 ppm18 of 18UCMR 3 (2014)
Molybdenum1.43 ppb40 ppb2 of 18UCMR 3 (2014)
Vanadium1.28 ppb21 ppb13 of 18UCMR 3 (2014)
1,4-Dioxane0.087 ppb0.35 ppb1 of 16UCMR 3 (2014)
Chromium-60.73 ppb–16 of 18UCMR 3 (2014)
Chlorate138 ppb210 ppb12 of 18UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Clinton

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 08801, 08809, 08833

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Clinton Water Dept water safe to drink?

Clinton Water Dept has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found PFAS above the 2024 federal limits, which systems must meet by 2029. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Clinton Water Dept water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Clinton Water Dept found 5 PFAS at least once. The highest entry-point averages were above the federal limit for PFOA and PFOS: PFOA 7.9 ppt, PFOS 9.7 ppt (limit 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt for the others).

What is the lead level in Clinton Water Dept water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Clinton Water Dept is 6.8 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2024 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.