Tap Water Results

City of Santa Fe Water System water quality

Santa Fe, NM · serves 90,810 people (33,297 connections) · Surface water · Local government · EPA ID NM3505126

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Buckman Regional Water Treatment Plant. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 18 samples (2023–2025).
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 20.9 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level1.1 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2026 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved1 health-based violation since 2016, most recently Oct 2024.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 7 entry points tested Sep 2023 to May 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 4 of 18 samples. Highest result 20.9 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 1.1 ppb lead (Jan 2026 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 1.9 ppb (Jun 2025).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2026 – now (in progress)1.1 ppb
Jul 2025 – Dec 20251.3 ppb
Jan 2025 – Jun 20251.9 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2019 – Dec 20210.93 ppb
Jan 2016 – Dec 20181.8 ppb
Jan 2013 – Dec 20152.2 ppb
Jan 2010 – Dec 20125.7 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20104.8 ppb
Jan 2009 – Dec 20094.8 ppb
Jan 2007 – Dec 20094.8 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 20060 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20040 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

1
Health-based since 2016
6
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
21
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Oct 2024The system did not publish the required inventory of lead service lines (due October 2024). It says nothing about lead levels in the water.
EPA record: Lead and copper rule revisions · LSL Inventory
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese70 ppb300 ppb15 of 16UCMR 4 (2020)
Chromium-61.9 ppb–27 of 32UCMR 3 (2015)
Molybdenum5.3 ppb40 ppb9 of 32UCMR 3 (2015)
Chlorate380 ppb210 ppb24 of 32UCMR 3 (2015)
Vanadium9.2 ppb21 ppb28 of 32UCMR 3 (2015)
Strontium0.43 ppm1.5 ppm32 of 32UCMR 3 (2015)
1,4-Dioxane0.082 ppb0.35 ppb2 of 16UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

Santa Fe

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 87501, 87502, 87503, 87504, 87505, 87506, 87507, 87508, 87509, 87592, 87594

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is City of Santa Fe Water System water safe to drink?

City of Santa Fe Water System had 1 health-based violation since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does City of Santa Fe Water System water have PFAS?

EPA tested City of Santa Fe Water System for 29 PFAS between Sep 2023 and May 2025 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).

What is the lead level in City of Santa Fe Water System water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of Santa Fe Water System is 1.1 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2026 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.