Tap Water Results

Edmond Public Works Authority water quality

Edmond, OK · serves 79,408 people (32,937 connections) · Surface water · Local government · EPA ID OK1020723

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Oklahoma City Utilities. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit6 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 20.7 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2026 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 18 entry points tested Apr 2024 to Jan 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Rounds to the limit
Limit 4 ppt
4.03 ppt
at the limit
6.4 ppt4 pptRounds to the limit
PFHxS
Detected, below limit
Limit 10 ppt
3.85 ppt
39% of the limit
4.5 ppt10 pptDetected, below limit
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.390.451Detected, below limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
3.3 ppt4.7 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
1.5 ppt6 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
5.53 ppt6.8 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
4.17 ppt4.6 pptnoneDetected, no limit

Why "rounds to the limit"? the PFOS average (4.03 ppt) is slightly above the number on paper, but EPA compares results after rounding to the limit's precision (4.4 ppt rounds to 4), so it meets the limit as EPA applies it. Close enough to the limit to be worth watching.

29 PFAS tested, 6 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 33 of 37 samples. Highest result 20.7 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2026 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 4.4 ppb (Dec 2022).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2026 – now (in progress)0 ppb
Jan 2025 – Dec 20250.8 ppb
Jan 2024 – Dec 20240 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2023 – Dec 20230 ppb
Jan 2022 – Dec 20224.4 ppb
Jan 2021 – Dec 20210 ppb
Jan 2020 – Dec 20200 ppb
Jan 2019 – Dec 20190 ppb
Jan 2018 – Dec 20180 ppb
Jan 2013 – Dec 20150.59 ppb
Jan 2010 – Dec 20120 ppb
Jan 2007 – Dec 20095 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
0
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
45
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese6.11 ppb300 ppb11 of 39UCMR 4 (2020)
Vanadium193 ppb21 ppb87 of 87UCMR 3 (2015)
Chromium-650.9 ppb–88 of 88UCMR 3 (2015)
Chlorate749 ppb210 ppb43 of 88UCMR 3 (2015)
Molybdenum5.86 ppb40 ppb24 of 87UCMR 3 (2015)
Strontium1.47 ppm1.5 ppm87 of 87UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

Edmond

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 73007, 73083

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Edmond Public Works Authority water safe to drink?

Edmond Public Works Authority has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Edmond Public Works Authority water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Edmond Public Works Authority found 6 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Edmond Public Works Authority water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Edmond Public Works Authority is 0 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2026 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.