Tap Water Results

PRASA – Ponce Urbano water quality

Ponce, PR · serves 113,972 people (42,686 connections) · Surface water · Local government · EPA ID PR0003824

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Summary

PFAS above the 2024 federal limits. Systems have until 2029 to meet the PFAS limits.

Is it an emergency? No: PFAS limits are about years of exposure, not a glass of water, and nothing in EPA's data calls for you to stop drinking the water today. If your utility ever issues a boil-water or do-not-drink notice, follow it.

PFAS
Above limitPFOS, PFHxS, the PFAS Hazard Index above the federal limit in EPA's 2023–2025 testing (PFOS 25.3 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, PFHxS 15 ppt vs a limit of 10 ppt, where ppt = parts per trillion).
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 25.3 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Out of dateEPA's national database has no lead results for this system since 2014 (then 6 ppb, 90th percentile). Systems this size normally test every one to three years, so this most likely means newer results were not reported to EPA, not that testing stopped. Ask the utility for its latest results.
Violations
Resolved40 health-based violations since 2016, most recently Jan 2024. 19 required an urgent public notice within 24 hours (the kind behind boil-water notices), most recently Jan 2024. What to do if you get a notice.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 23 entry points tested Jun 2023 to Mar 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
One sample above limit
Limit 4 ppt
2.55 ppt
64% of the limit
5.1 ppt4 pptOne sample above limit
PFOS
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
25.3 ppt
6.33× the limit
25.6 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFHxS
Above limit
Limit 10 ppt
15 ppt
1.5× the limit
16.7 ppt10 pptAbove limit
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Above limit
Limit 1
1.51.671Above limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
8.95 ppt9.2 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
3.55 ppt7.1 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
3.6 ppt7.2 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
3.7 ppt7.4 pptnoneDetected, no limit
PFDoA
Detected, no limit
1.6 ppt3.2 pptnoneDetected, no limit

For context: the PFOS average is higher than at 97% of the Puerto Rico systems EPA tested and the PFHxS average is higher than at 98% of the Puerto Rico systems EPA tested.

29 PFAS tested, 8 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 4 of 52 samples. Highest result 25.3 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 6 ppb lead (Jul 2014 – Dec 2014). No results since 2014

This is the newest lead result in EPA's national database. Utilities report lead results to their state, and states pass them to EPA. Gaps like this usually mean the newer results did not reach EPA's database, not that the utility stopped testing. Results this old may not reflect the water today. Ask the utility or your state drinking water program for the latest lead monitoring.

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jul 2014 – Dec 20146 ppb
Jul 2013 – Dec 20137 ppb
Jul 2012 – Dec 201210 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jul 2011 – Dec 20119 ppb
Jul 2010 – Dec 20106 ppb
Jul 2009 – Dec 20097 ppb
Jul 2008 – Dec 20083 ppb
Jul 2007 – Dec 20073.9 ppb
Jan 2007 – Jun 20074 ppb
Jul 2005 – Dec 20055 ppb
Jul 2004 – Dec 20042.1 ppb
Jul 2003 – Dec 20034.8 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

40
Health-based since 2016
171
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
784
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Mar 2019 – Jan 2024
12 times
The water was cloudier than allowed at least once. Cloudiness can shield germs from disinfection.
Urgent public notice required What that means
EPA record: Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule · Single Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR) (limit )
Resolved
Resolved
Oct 2018 – Aug 2023
7 times
The water was too cloudy too often in a month. Cloudiness can shield germs from disinfection.
Urgent public notice required What that means
EPA record: Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule · Monthly Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR) (limit )
Resolved
Resolved
Jul 2016 – Jan 2019
7 times
The running annual average for TTHM was above the legal limit.
EPA record: TTHM · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average · measured 0.095 mg/l (limit 0.080 mg/L)
Resolved
Resolved
Apr 2017 – Jan 2019
9 times
The system did not remove enough organic matter, which reacts with chlorine to form disinfection byproducts.
EPA record: Carbon, total · Treatment Technique Precursor Removal (limit TT )
Resolved
Resolved
Oct 2016 – Jan 2019
5 times
The running annual average for Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) was above the legal limit.
EPA record: Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average · measured 0.068 mg/l (limit 0.060 mg/L)
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese39.8 ppb300 ppb13 of 44UCMR 4 (2020)
Strontium2.06 ppm1.5 ppm65 of 65UCMR 3 (2016)
Vanadium11.8 ppb21 ppb69 of 69UCMR 3 (2016)
Molybdenum4.43 ppb40 ppb4 of 69UCMR 3 (2016)
Chlorate61.5 ppb210 ppb18 of 67UCMR 3 (2016)
Chromium-61.6 ppb–37 of 41UCMR 3 (2016)

Where it serves

Ponce, Peñuelas

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 00726, 00731

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is PRASA – Ponce Urbano water safe to drink?

PRASA – Ponce Urbano had 40 health-based violations since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found PFAS above the 2024 federal limits, which systems must meet by 2029. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does PRASA – Ponce Urbano water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of PRASA – Ponce Urbano found 8 PFAS at least once. The highest entry-point averages were above the federal limit for PFOS and PFHxS: PFOS 25.3 ppt, PFHxS 15 ppt (limit 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt for the others).

What is the lead level in PRASA – Ponce Urbano water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for PRASA – Ponce Urbano is 6 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2014, which is more than five years old. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.