Tap Water Results

PRASA – Fajardo Ceiba water quality

Fajardo, PR · serves 59,044 people (22,114 connections) · Surface water · Local government · EPA ID PR0005306

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Summary

No limits exceeded in the data EPA has, but the record is incomplete: no lead results since 2014.

PFAS
Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 4 samples (2023–2025).
Lead
Out of dateEPA's national database has no lead results for this system since 2014 (then 6 ppb, 90th percentile). Systems this size normally test every one to three years, so this most likely means newer results were not reported to EPA, not that testing stopped. Ask the utility for its latest results.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 1 entry point tested Apr 2024 to Jan 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 4 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 6 ppb lead (Jul 2014 – Dec 2014). No results since 2014

This is the newest lead result in EPA's national database. Utilities report lead results to their state, and states pass them to EPA. Gaps like this usually mean the newer results did not reach EPA's database, not that the utility stopped testing. Results this old may not reflect the water today. Ask the utility or your state drinking water program for the latest lead monitoring.

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jul 2014 – Dec 20146 ppb
Jul 2011 – Dec 20116 ppb
Jul 2010 – Dec 20105 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jul 2009 – Dec 20096 ppb
Jan 2008 – Jun 200811 ppb
Jul 2007 – Dec 20076.2 ppb
Jan 2007 – Jun 20070.8 ppb
Jul 2006 – Dec 20064 ppb
Jan 2006 – Jun 20068 ppb
Jul 2005 – Dec 20056 ppb
Jan 2005 – Jun 200511 ppb
Jul 2004 – Dec 20046.5 ppb

Copper 90th percentile: 1.4 ppm (Jan 1992), action level 1,300 ppb.

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
22
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
225
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese2.45 ppb300 ppb1 of 4UCMR 4 (2020)
Strontium0.033 ppm1.5 ppm6 of 6UCMR 3 (2016)
Chromium-60.042 ppb–2 of 5UCMR 3 (2016)
Vanadium1.55 ppb21 ppb6 of 6UCMR 3 (2016)

Where it serves

Fajardo

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 00726, 00738

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is PRASA – Fajardo Ceiba water safe to drink?

PRASA – Fajardo Ceiba has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does PRASA – Fajardo Ceiba water have PFAS?

EPA tested PRASA – Fajardo Ceiba for 29 PFAS between Apr 2024 and Jan 2025 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).

What is the lead level in PRASA – Fajardo Ceiba water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for PRASA – Fajardo Ceiba is 6 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2014, which is more than five years old. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.