Tap Water Results

Is Charleston, SC tap water safe?

Supplied by Charleston Water System · serves 278,771 people (126,756 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID SC1010001

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Summary

PFAS above the 2024 federal limits. Systems have until 2029 to meet the PFAS limits.

Is it an emergency? No: PFAS limits are about years of exposure, not a glass of water, and nothing in EPA's data calls for you to stop drinking the water today. If your utility ever issues a boil-water or do-not-drink notice, follow it.

PFAS
Above limitPFOA, PFOS above the federal limit in EPA's 2023–2025 testing (PFOA 4.33 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, PFOS 5.83 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, where ppt = parts per trillion).
Lead
Below action level3.5 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2024. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved2 health-based violations since 2016, most recently Jul 2025.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 1 entry point tested Mar 2025 to Dec 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
4.33 ppt
1.08× the limit
4.7 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFOS
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
5.83 ppt
1.46× the limit
6.5 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.00190.00221Detected, below limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
3.9 ppt4.3 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
4.15 ppt4.6 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
4.63 ppt5 pptnoneDetected, no limit

For context: the PFOA average is higher than at 80% of the South Carolina systems EPA tested and the PFOS average is higher than at 75% of the South Carolina systems EPA tested.

29 PFAS tested, 5 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 4 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 3.5 ppb lead (Jan 2022 – Dec 2024). Below action level

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2022 – Dec 20243.5 ppb
Jan 2019 – Dec 20212.1 ppb
Jan 2016 – Dec 20182.3 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2013 – Dec 20151.3 ppb
Jan 2010 – Dec 20122.3 ppb
Jan 2007 – Dec 20094.5 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20063 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20034 ppb
Jan 1999 – Jul 19993.8 ppb
Jul 1998 – Jan 19994 ppb
Jul 1997 – Jan 19984 ppb
Jul 1993 – Jun 19972.2 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

2
Health-based since 2016
0
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
18
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Jan 2025 – Jul 2025
2 times
The water chemistry that keeps lead from dissolving out of pipes was outside the range the state set.
EPA record: Lead and Copper Rule · WQP Entry Point/Tap Treatment Technique Non-Compliance (limit TT )
Archived
Archived

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese14.4 ppb300 ppb4 of 4UCMR 4 (2020)
Strontium0.061 ppm1.5 ppm8 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Chlorate240 ppb210 ppb8 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Chromium-60.079 ppb–8 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
Vanadium1.4 ppb21 ppb8 of 8UCMR 3 (2014)
1,4-Dioxane0.24 ppb0.35 ppb3 of 4UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Charleston

35 ZIP codes the system reported serving

29401, 29402, 29403, 29404, 29405, 29406, 29407, 29409, 29410, 29412, 29414, 29418, 29420, 29423, 29424, 29425, 29426, 29429, 29439, 29445, 29449, 29450, 29451, 29455, 29456, 29461, 29464, 29466, 29470, 29482, 29483, 29485, 29486, 29487, 29492

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Charleston tap water safe to drink?

Most of Charleston gets its water from Charleston Water System. Charleston Water System had 2 health-based violations since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found PFAS above the 2024 federal limits, which systems must meet by 2029. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Charleston water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Charleston Water System found 5 PFAS at least once. The highest entry-point averages were above the federal limit for PFOA and PFOS: PFOA 4.33 ppt, PFOS 5.83 ppt (limit 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt for the others).

What is the lead level in Charleston water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Charleston Water System is 3.5 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2024. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.