Tap Water Results

Lancaster County Water & Sewer District water quality

Lancaster, SC · serves 79,107 people (36,859 connections) · Purchased surface water · Local government · EPA ID SC2920001

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Town of Kershaw, Catawba River Wsp Water System. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit2 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lead
Below action level5 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2025. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved1 health-based violation since 2016, most recently Feb 2019. One required an urgent public notice within 24 hours (the kind behind boil-water notices), most recently Feb 2019. What to do if you get a notice.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 1 entry point tested Mar 2025 to Dec 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
5.88 ppt6.6 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
6.35 ppt7.2 pptnoneDetected, no limit

29 PFAS tested, 2 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 4 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 5 ppb lead (Jan 2023 – Dec 2025). Below action level

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2023 – Dec 20255 ppb
Jan 2020 – Dec 20220 ppb
Jan 2017 – Dec 20193 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2014 – Dec 20163.5 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 20134 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20100 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20072.5 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20041.6 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20032.7 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20025.3 ppb
Jan 2000 – Dec 20007.1 ppb
Jan 1999 – Dec 19995 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

1
Health-based since 2016
0
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
28
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Feb 2019E. coli was confirmed in the water. E. coli means the water may have been contaminated with sewage or animal waste.
Urgent public notice required What that means
EPA record: Revised Total Coliform Rule · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, E. coli (RTCR)
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Vanadium1.9 ppb21 ppb12 of 12UCMR 3 (2015)
Strontium0.068 ppm1.5 ppm12 of 12UCMR 3 (2015)
Chromium-60.24 ppb–12 of 12UCMR 3 (2015)
Chlorate450 ppb210 ppb12 of 12UCMR 3 (2015)
1,4-Dioxane0.4 ppb0.35 ppb8 of 8UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

Lancaster

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 29058, 29067, 29707, 29720, 29721, 29744

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Lancaster County Water & Sewer District water safe to drink?

Lancaster County Water & Sewer District had 1 health-based violation since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Lancaster County Water & Sewer District water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Lancaster County Water & Sewer District found 2 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Lancaster County Water & Sewer District water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Lancaster County Water & Sewer District is 5 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2025. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.