Tap Water Results

Is Sioux Falls, SD tap water safe?

Supplied by Sioux Falls Water System · serves 216,462 people (63,541 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID SD4600294

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Sioux Falls gets its water from Sioux Falls Water System. Parts of the city are served by 8 smaller systems: Lincoln County Rural Water System (5,965 people), Tm Rural Water District (4,250 people), Pine Lake Hills Water System (320 people), Valley View Estates Water System (230 people) and 4 more. Your water bill names your system.

Buys water from Lewis and Clark Regional Water Syste. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 8 samples (2023–2025).
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 70.9 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level3 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2024. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 2 entry points tested Aug 2023 to May 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 8 of 8 samples. Highest result 70.9 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 3 ppb lead (Jan 2024 – Dec 2024). Below action level

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2024 – Dec 20243 ppb
Jan 2021 – Dec 20211 ppb
Jan 2018 – Dec 20181 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2015 – Dec 20153 ppb
Jan 2012 – Dec 20126 ppb
Jan 2009 – Dec 20096 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 20066 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20034 ppb
Jan 2000 – Dec 20001 ppb
Jan 1998 – Dec 19982 ppb
Jan 1997 – Dec 19972 ppb
Jul 1996 – Dec 19962 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
0
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
4
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese0.4 ppb300 ppb1 of 8UCMR 4 (2020)
Strontium0.4 ppm1.5 ppm16 of 16UCMR 3 (2014)
Molybdenum10 ppb40 ppb16 of 16UCMR 3 (2014)
Chromium-60.5 ppb–16 of 16UCMR 3 (2014)
Chlorate480 ppb210 ppb10 of 16UCMR 3 (2014)
Vanadium2.3 ppb21 ppb16 of 16UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Sioux Falls

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 57101, 57103, 57104, 57105, 57106, 57107, 57108, 57109, 57110, 57117, 57118, 57197

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Sioux Falls tap water safe to drink?

Most of Sioux Falls gets its water from Sioux Falls Water System. Sioux Falls Water System has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Sioux Falls water have PFAS?

EPA tested Sioux Falls Water System for 29 PFAS between Aug 2023 and May 2024 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).

What is the lead level in Sioux Falls water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Sioux Falls Water System is 3 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2024. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.