Tap Water Results

Is Pasadena, TX tap water safe?

Supplied by City of Pasadena · serves 152,000 people (63,669 connections) · Purchased surface water · EPA ID TX1010293

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from City of Houston. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit7 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 18.7 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level3.72 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2024. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 9 entry points tested Mar 2024 to Jan 2026. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
One sample above limit
Limit 4 ppt
3.3 ppt
83% of the limit
4.9 ppt4 pptOne sample above limit
PFHxS
Detected, below limit
Limit 10 ppt
3.85 ppt
39% of the limit
4.3 ppt10 pptDetected, below limit
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.390.431Detected, below limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
3.28 ppt3.5 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
9.35 ppt12.7 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
6.38 ppt7 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
6.98 ppt8.4 pptnoneDetected, no limit
PFHpA
Detected, no limit
1.6 ppt3.3 pptnoneDetected, no limit

29 PFAS tested, 7 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 14 of 24 samples. Highest result 18.7 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 3.72 ppb lead (Jan 2022 – Dec 2024). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 4.8 ppb (Dec 2016).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2022 – Dec 20243.72 ppb
Jan 2019 – Dec 20212.4 ppb
Jul 2018 – Dec 20180 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2018 – Jun 20180 ppb
Jan 2016 – Dec 20164.8 ppb
Jan 2010 – Dec 20123.44 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20054.8 ppb
Jan 2000 – Dec 20022.7 ppb
Jan 1999 – Dec 19996 ppb
Jan 1998 – Dec 19986.3 ppb
Jul 1997 – Dec 19975.5 ppb
Jan 1997 – Jun 19974.4 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
2
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now (plus 1 paperwork)
13
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

1 unresolved monitoring or reporting violation: Public Notice.

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese22.3 ppb300 ppb22 of 22UCMR 4 (2019)
Molybdenum7.8 ppb40 ppb30 of 30UCMR 3 (2014)
Vanadium0.85 ppb21 ppb5 of 30UCMR 3 (2014)
Strontium0.3 ppm1.5 ppm30 of 30UCMR 3 (2014)
Chromium-60.044 ppb–4 of 30UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Pasadena

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 77057, 77501, 77502, 77503, 77504, 77505, 77506, 77508

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Pasadena tap water safe to drink?

Most of Pasadena gets its water from City of Pasadena. City of Pasadena has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Pasadena water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of City of Pasadena found 7 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Pasadena water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of Pasadena is 3.72 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2024. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.