Tap Water Results

Is San Marcos, TX tap water safe?

Supplied by City of San Marcos · serves 72,970 people (42,746 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID TX1050001

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Alliance Regional Water Authority 1B. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit3 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lead
Below action level1.63 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2024. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved2 health-based violations since 2016, most recently Oct 2025.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 7 entry points tested Nov 2023 to Aug 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Detected, below limit
Limit 10 ppt
1.7 ppt
17% of the limit
3.4 ppt10 pptDetected, below limit
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.170.341Detected, below limit
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
2.85 ppt11.4 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
2.9 ppt4.2 pptnoneDetected, no limit

29 PFAS tested, 3 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 5 of 26 samples. Highest result 11.3 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Below screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 1.63 ppb lead (Jan 2022 – Dec 2024). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 2.8 ppb (Dec 2017).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2022 – Dec 20241.63 ppb
Jan 2019 – Dec 20211.91 ppb
Jan 2018 – Jun 20182.1 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jul 2017 – Dec 20172.8 ppb
Jan 2013 – Dec 20153.4 ppb
Jan 2010 – Dec 20123.14 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20103.43 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20073 ppb
Jan 1999 – Dec 20012.4 ppb
Jan 1996 – Dec 19983.7 ppb
Jan 1995 – Dec 19956.7 ppb
Jan 1994 – Dec 19944.9 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

2
Health-based since 2016
1
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
11
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Jan 2016 – Oct 2025
2 times
The running annual average for TTHM was above the legal limit.
EPA record: TTHM · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average · measured 0.081 mg/l (limit 0.080 mg/L)
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese3.5 ppb300 ppb7 of 18UCMR 4 (2018)
Chlorate1,100 ppb210 ppb30 of 48UCMR 3 (2015)
Vanadium3.1 ppb21 ppb48 of 48UCMR 3 (2015)
Strontium0.8 ppm1.5 ppm48 of 48UCMR 3 (2015)
Chromium-60.17 ppb–43 of 48UCMR 3 (2015)
Molybdenum1.2 ppb40 ppb8 of 48UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

San Marcos

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 78666, 78667

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is San Marcos tap water safe to drink?

Most of San Marcos gets its water from City of San Marcos. City of San Marcos had 2 health-based violations since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does San Marcos water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of City of San Marcos found 3 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in San Marcos water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of San Marcos is 1.63 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2024. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.