Tap Water Results

Is Abilene, TX tap water safe?

Supplied by City of Abilene · serves 130,501 people (82,427 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID TX2210001

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Abilene gets its water from City of Abilene. Parts of the city are served by 2 smaller systems: Steamboat Mountain Water Supply Corporation (8,178 people), Dyess Air Force Base Water System (7,183 people). Your water bill names your system.

Buys water from West Central Texas Municipal Water District. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

PFAS above the 2024 federal limits. Systems have until 2029 to meet the PFAS limits.

Is it an emergency? No: PFAS limits are about years of exposure, not a glass of water, and nothing in EPA's data calls for you to stop drinking the water today. If your utility ever issues a boil-water or do-not-drink notice, follow it.

PFAS
Above limitPFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, the PFAS Hazard Index above the federal limit in EPA's 2023–2025 testing (PFOA 6.85 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, PFOS 25.3 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, PFHxS 26.1 ppt vs a limit of 10 ppt, where ppt = parts per trillion).
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 48.1 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2024 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved1 health-based violation since 2016, most recently Feb 2021. One required an urgent public notice within 24 hours (the kind behind boil-water notices), most recently Feb 2021. What to do if you get a notice.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 3 entry points tested Sep 2023 to Jun 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
6.85 ppt
1.71× the limit
7.7 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFOS
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
25.3 ppt
6.32× the limit
30 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFHxS
Above limit
Limit 10 ppt
26.1 ppt
2.61× the limit
32.4 ppt10 pptAbove limit
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Above limit
Limit 1
2.613.241Above limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
6.9 ppt8.2 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
21.8 ppt43.1 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
20.2 ppt23.5 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
17.3 ppt22.9 pptnoneDetected, no limit
PFHpA
Detected, no limit
9.75 ppt12.4 pptnoneDetected, no limit
PFPeS
Detected, no limit
1.13 ppt4.5 pptnoneDetected, no limit

For context: the PFOA average is higher than at 99% of the Texas systems EPA tested, the PFOS average is higher than at 99% of the Texas systems EPA tested and the PFHxS average is higher than at 99% of the Texas systems EPA tested.

29 PFAS tested, 9 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 11 of 12 samples. Highest result 48.1 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2024 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2024 – now (in progress)0 ppb
Jan 2021 – Dec 20230 ppb
Jan 2018 – Dec 20200 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jul 2017 – Dec 20170 ppb
Jan 2017 – Jun 20170 ppb
Jan 2013 – Dec 20153.3 ppb
Jan 2010 – Dec 20121.75 ppb
Jan 2007 – Dec 20092.1 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20053.6 ppb
Jan 2000 – Dec 20021.6 ppb
Jan 1999 – Dec 19993.3 ppb
Jan 1998 – Dec 19983.1 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

1
Health-based since 2016
2
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
19
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Feb 2021The water was too cloudy too often in a month. Cloudiness can shield germs from disinfection.
Urgent public notice required What that means
EPA record: Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule · Monthly Turbidity Exceed (Enhanced SWTR) (limit )
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese38.1 ppb300 ppb12 of 12UCMR 4 (2020)
Strontium1.31 ppm1.5 ppm24 of 24UCMR 3 (2013)
Chromium-60.062 ppb–12 of 24UCMR 3 (2013)
Chlorate374 ppb210 ppb24 of 24UCMR 3 (2013)
Vanadium0.38 ppb21 ppb9 of 24UCMR 3 (2013)
Molybdenum4.52 ppb40 ppb24 of 24UCMR 3 (2013)

Where it serves

Abilene

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 79601, 79602, 79603, 79604, 79605, 79606

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Abilene tap water safe to drink?

Most of Abilene gets its water from City of Abilene. City of Abilene had 1 health-based violation since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found PFAS above the 2024 federal limits, which systems must meet by 2029. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Abilene water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of City of Abilene found 9 PFAS at least once. The highest entry-point averages were above the federal limit for PFOA and PFOS and PFHxS: PFOA 6.85 ppt, PFOS 25.3 ppt, PFHxS 26.1 ppt (limit 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt for the others).

What is the lead level in Abilene water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of Abilene is 0 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2024 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.