Tap Water Results

Is Saratoga Springs, UT tap water safe?

Supplied by Saratoga Springs City Water System · serves 68,000 people (17,571 connections) · Purchased surface water · EPA ID UTAH25138

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Central Utah Water Conservancy District – Utah Valley. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 12 samples (2023–2025).
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 33.8 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level1.7 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2024. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved2 health-based violations since 2016, most recently Jul 2018.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 5 entry points tested Sep 2024 to Aug 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 6 of 12 samples. Highest result 33.8 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 1.7 ppb lead (Jan 2022 – Dec 2024). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 2.1 ppb (Dec 2020).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2022 – Dec 20241.7 ppb
Jan 2019 – Dec 20211.5 ppb
Jan 2018 – Dec 20202.1 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2015 – Dec 20151.4 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 20131.2 ppb
Jan 2009 – Dec 20111.6 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20102 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 20081 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20052 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20035 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 200224 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 200113 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

2
Health-based since 2016
2
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
117
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Jul 2018An inspection found a significant problem (such as a damaged well or storage tank) that was not fixed on time.
EPA record: Groundwater Rule · Failure To Address Deficiency (limit )
Resolved
Resolved
Aug 2016After positive bacteria tests, the system did not complete the required check of what went wrong.
EPA record: Revised Total Coliform Rule · Treatment Technique, Level 1 Assessment (RTCR)
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese150 ppb300 ppb13 of 13UCMR 4 (2020)
Molybdenum3.12 ppb40 ppb9 of 9UCMR 3 (2016)
Vanadium2.36 ppb21 ppb9 of 9UCMR 3 (2016)
Strontium0.95 ppm1.5 ppm9 of 9UCMR 3 (2016)
Chromium-61.1 ppb–9 of 9UCMR 3 (2016)

Where it serves

Saratoga Springs

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 84013, 84043, 84045

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Saratoga Springs tap water safe to drink?

Most of Saratoga Springs gets its water from Saratoga Springs City Water System. Saratoga Springs City Water System had 2 health-based violations since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Saratoga Springs water have PFAS?

EPA tested Saratoga Springs City Water System for 29 PFAS between Sep 2024 and Aug 2025 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).

What is the lead level in Saratoga Springs water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Saratoga Springs City Water System is 1.7 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2024. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.