Tap Water Results

Is Casa Grande, AZ tap water safe?

Supplied by Arizona Water Company – Pinal Valley · serves 134,432 people (38,340 connections) · Groundwater · EPA ID AZ0411009

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Casa Grande gets its water from Arizona Water Company – Pinal Valley. Parts of the city are served by 7 smaller systems: Picacho Water Company (2,440 people), Arizona Water Company – Tierra Grande (1,819 people), Awc – Casa Grande West Water Company (951 people), Arizona Water Company – Stanfield (628 people) and 3 more. Your water bill names your system.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit6 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 353 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2025. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 10 entry points tested Aug 2024 to Feb 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Detected, below limit
Limit 10 ppt
5.85 ppt
59% of the limit
6.1 ppt10 pptDetected, below limit
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.630.651Detected, below limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
88.3 ppt91.1 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
19.3 ppt19.9 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
17.6 ppt18.6 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
20.1 ppt20.8 pptnoneDetected, no limit
PFHpA
Detected, no limit
8.6 ppt9.4 pptnoneDetected, no limit

29 PFAS tested, 6 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 20 of 20 samples. Highest result 353 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2023 – Dec 2025). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 1 ppb (Dec 2016).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2023 – Dec 20250 ppb
Jan 2022 – Dec 20240 ppb
Jan 2017 – Dec 20190 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2014 – Dec 20161 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 20132.7 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20103 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 20080 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20070 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20050 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20040 ppb
Jan 1999 – Dec 20012 ppb
Jan 1993 – Jun 19932 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
4
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
521
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese0.85 ppb300 ppb7 of 20UCMR 4 (2020)
Chromium-637 ppb–38 of 38UCMR 3 (2014)
Molybdenum9.2 ppb40 ppb35 of 38UCMR 3 (2014)
Strontium3.6 ppm1.5 ppm38 of 38UCMR 3 (2014)
Vanadium12 ppb21 ppb38 of 38UCMR 3 (2014)
Chlorate480 ppb210 ppb37 of 38UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Casa Grande

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 85122, 85128, 85193, 85194

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Casa Grande tap water safe to drink?

Most of Casa Grande gets its water from Arizona Water Company – Pinal Valley. Arizona Water Company – Pinal Valley has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Casa Grande water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Arizona Water Company – Pinal Valley found 6 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Casa Grande water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Arizona Water Company – Pinal Valley is 0 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2025. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.