Tap Water Results

Is Maricopa, AZ tap water safe?

Supplied by Global Water – Santa Cruz Water Company · serves 84,000 people (17,123 connections) · Groundwater · EPA ID AZ0411131

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Maricopa gets its water from Global Water – Santa Cruz Water Company. Parts of the city are served by 9 smaller systems: Thunderbird Farms Dwid Water System (2,315 people), Global Water – Santa Cruz Water – Maricopa Sw (1,848 people), Copper Mountain Ranch Cfd Water System (1,071 people), Maricopa Consolidated Dwid Water System (928 people) and 5 more. Your water bill names your system.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 4 samples (2023–2025).
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 263 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2024. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved1 health-based violation since 2016, most recently Aug 2025. One required an urgent public notice within 24 hours (the kind behind boil-water notices), most recently Aug 2025. What to do if you get a notice.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 2 entry points tested May 2024 to Nov 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 4 of 4 samples. Highest result 263 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2022 – Dec 2024). Below action level

1 reported result in EPA's records is far above anything physically plausible (likely a unit or data-entry error) and is not used in the summary.

Highest since 2016: 1.1 ppb (Dec 2020).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2022 – Dec 20240 ppb
Jan 2021 – Jun 20210 ppb
Jul 2020 – Dec 20200.75 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2018 – Dec 20201.1 ppb
Jan 2016 – Dec 20181.1 ppb
Jan 2015 – Dec 20170 ppb
Jan 2013 – Dec 20150 ppb
Jan 2012 – Dec 20141.1 ppb
Jan 2010 – Dec 20121.1 ppb
Jan 2009 – Dec 20110 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 20083.1 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 2006Reported value looks erroneous

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

1
Health-based since 2016
71
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
98
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Aug 2025E. coli was confirmed in the water. E. coli means the water may have been contaminated with sewage or animal waste.
Urgent public notice required What that means
EPA record: Revised Total Coliform Rule · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, E. coli (RTCR)
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese1.9 ppb300 ppb1 of 2UCMR 4 (2018)
Molybdenum4.3 ppb40 ppb4 of 4UCMR 3 (2013)
Chromium-67 ppb–4 of 4UCMR 3 (2013)
Chlorate280 ppb210 ppb4 of 4UCMR 3 (2013)
Vanadium7.2 ppb21 ppb4 of 4UCMR 3 (2013)
Strontium2.5 ppm1.5 ppm4 of 4UCMR 3 (2013)

Where it serves

Maricopa

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 85138, 85139

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Maricopa tap water safe to drink?

Most of Maricopa gets its water from Global Water – Santa Cruz Water Company. Global Water – Santa Cruz Water Company had 1 health-based violation since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Maricopa water have PFAS?

EPA tested Global Water – Santa Cruz Water Company for 29 PFAS between May 2024 and Nov 2024 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).

What is the lead level in Maricopa water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Global Water – Santa Cruz Water Company is 0 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2024. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.