Tap Water Results

Is Prescott Valley, AZ tap water safe?

Supplied by Town of Prescott Valley · serves 57,048 people (23,770 connections) · Groundwater · EPA ID AZ0413048

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Prescott Valley gets its water from Town of Prescott Valley. Parts of the city are served by 3 smaller systems: Mingus West Water System (602 people), Ventura Ranch Dwid Water System (300 people), Mingus Mountain Academy Water System (130 people). Your water bill names your system.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 38 samples (2023–2025).
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 24.7 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2024 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 19 entry points tested Mar 2024 to Dec 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 4 of 38 samples. Highest result 24.7 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2024 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2024 – now (in progress)0 ppb
Jan 2021 – Dec 20230 ppb
Jan 2019 – Dec 20210 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jul 2020 – Dec 20200 ppb
Jan 2020 – Jun 20200 ppb
Jan 2017 – Dec 20190 ppb
Jan 2016 – Dec 20180 ppb
Jan 2014 – Dec 20160 ppb
Jan 2013 – Dec 20150 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 20130 ppb
Jan 2010 – Dec 20122 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20102 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
5
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
380
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese3.4 ppb300 ppb4 of 12UCMR 4 (2019)
Vanadium34 ppb21 ppb44 of 44UCMR 3 (2015)
Strontium0.38 ppm1.5 ppm44 of 44UCMR 3 (2015)
Cobalt1.1 ppb70 ppb1 of 44UCMR 3 (2015)
Chromium-616 ppb–43 of 44UCMR 3 (2015)
Molybdenum3.3 ppb40 ppb43 of 44UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

Prescott Valley

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 86314, 86315, 86327

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Prescott Valley tap water safe to drink?

Most of Prescott Valley gets its water from Town of Prescott Valley. Town of Prescott Valley has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Prescott Valley water have PFAS?

EPA tested Town of Prescott Valley for 29 PFAS between Mar 2024 and Dec 2025 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).

What is the lead level in Prescott Valley water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Town of Prescott Valley is 0 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2024 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.