Tap Water Results

San Gabriel Valley Water Company – El Monte water quality

El Monte, CA · serves 240,000 people (46,785 connections) · Groundwater · Private · EPA ID CA1910039

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Suburban Water Systems-San Jose, City of Whittier Water Dept., City of Pico Rivera Water Dept., Valley County Water District, City of Santa Fe Springs Water Dept., City of Arcadia, San Gabriel Valley Water Company – Montebello 2. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit2 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2024 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved2 health-based violations since 2016, most recently Jun 2019.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 9 entry points tested Feb 2025 to Aug 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
5 ppt10 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
2.8 ppt5.6 pptnoneDetected, no limit

29 PFAS tested, 2 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 18 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2024 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 1.4 ppb (Dec 2017).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2024 – now (in progress)0 ppb
Jan 2021 – Dec 20230 ppb
Jan 2018 – Dec 20200.47 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2015 – Dec 20171.4 ppb
Jan 2012 – Dec 20140 ppb
Jan 2009 – Dec 20112 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 20082 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20052 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20052 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20035 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20025 ppb
Jan 2000 – Dec 20025 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

2
Health-based since 2016
0
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
5
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Sep 2018 – Jun 2019
2 times
A required step to remove or kill germs (filtration, disinfection or fixing a contaminated well) was not done properly.
EPA record: Groundwater Rule · Treatment Technique (SWTR and GWR) (limit )
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese2.8 ppb300 ppb6 of 19UCMR 4 (2020)
1,4-Dioxane0.63 ppb0.35 ppb17 of 20UCMR 3 (2015)
Vanadium9.3 ppb21 ppb32 of 32UCMR 3 (2015)
Chromium-65.6 ppb–32 of 32UCMR 3 (2015)
Chlorate460 ppb210 ppb32 of 32UCMR 3 (2015)
Strontium0.66 ppm1.5 ppm32 of 32UCMR 3 (2015)
Cobalt1.3 ppb70 ppb2 of 32UCMR 3 (2015)
Molybdenum19 ppb40 ppb32 of 32UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

El Monte, San Gabriel, West Covina, Whittier, Industry, Hacienda Heights, Arcadia, Santa Fe Springs, Irwindale, Montebello, Pico Rivera, Monterey Park, Rosemead, Temple City, La Puente, South El Monte, West Whittier-Los Nietos

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 90053, 90601, 90606, 90609, 90640, 90660, 90670, 91006, 91706, 91731, 91732, 91733, 91734, 91744, 91745, 91746, 91755, 91770, 91776, 91780, 91790

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is San Gabriel Valley Water Company – El Monte water safe to drink?

San Gabriel Valley Water Company – El Monte had 2 health-based violations since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does San Gabriel Valley Water Company – El Monte water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of San Gabriel Valley Water Company – El Monte found 2 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in San Gabriel Valley Water Company – El Monte water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for San Gabriel Valley Water Company – El Monte is 0 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2024 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.