Tap Water Results

City of Santa Ana water quality

Santa Ana, CA · serves 316,184 people (45,860 connections) · Purchased surface water · Local government · EPA ID CA3010038

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Mesa Water District, City of Fountain Valley, Metropolitan Water District of SO. Cal., City of Tustin. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

PFAS above the 2024 federal limits. Systems have until 2029 to meet the PFAS limits.

Is it an emergency? No: PFAS limits are about years of exposure, not a glass of water, and nothing in EPA's data calls for you to stop drinking the water today. If your utility ever issues a boil-water or do-not-drink notice, follow it.

PFAS
Above limitPFOA, PFOS above the federal limit in EPA's 2023–2025 testing (PFOA 8.1 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, PFOS 13.5 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, where ppt = parts per trillion).
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 42.4 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2024. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 12 entry points tested Mar 2023 to Apr 2026. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
8.1 ppt
2.02× the limit
8.9 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFOS
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
13.5 ppt
3.39× the limit
14.2 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFHxS
Detected, below limit
Limit 10 ppt
7.85 ppt
78% of the limit
8.4 ppt10 pptDetected, below limit
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.790.841Detected, below limit
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
3.7 ppt4 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
4.8 ppt5.9 pptnoneDetected, no limit

What the utility says it is doing: The Orange County Water District says it is building a PFAS ion exchange treatment plant for the City of Santa Ana at John Garthe Reservoir to treat five wells, with construction expected to begin in late July 2026 and run to summer 2028.

Source: City of Santa Ana PFAS Treatment at John Garthe Reservoir - OCWD (government record), 2026-06. Collected by us on Nov 14, 2026, not from EPA's data. Ask the utility for the latest.

For context: the PFOA average is higher than at 94% of the California systems EPA tested and the PFOS average is higher than at 92% of the California systems EPA tested.

29 PFAS tested, 5 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 9 of 27 samples. Highest result 42.4 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2022 – Dec 2024). Below action level

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2022 – Dec 20240 ppb
Jan 2019 – Dec 20210 ppb
Jan 2016 – Dec 20180 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2013 – Dec 20150 ppb
Jan 2010 – Dec 20120 ppb
Jan 2007 – Dec 20090 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20060 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20050 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20035 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20025 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 20015 ppb
Jan 1993 – Dec 19935 ppb

Lead service lines: City of Santa Ana's inventory lists 0 lead, 0 galvanized lines that need replacing (as of 2024-10-02). Counted by us from the utility's or state's published line-by-line inventory data.

Look up your address · Source (the utility, collected by us on Nov 14, 2026, not EPA data) · Checking your own line

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
1
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
8
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese3.28 ppb300 ppb16 of 29UCMR 4 (2020)
Chromium-62.06 ppb–36 of 36UCMR 3 (2014)
Strontium1.07 ppm1.5 ppm36 of 36UCMR 3 (2014)
Chlorate249 ppb210 ppb36 of 36UCMR 3 (2014)
Vanadium5.2 ppb21 ppb36 of 36UCMR 3 (2014)
1,4-Dioxane0.24 ppb0.35 ppb18 of 30UCMR 3 (2014)
Molybdenum11.1 ppb40 ppb36 of 36UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Santa Ana

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 92643, 92666, 92701, 92702, 92703, 92704, 92705, 92706, 92707, 92708, 92711, 92712, 92735, 92799, 92843, 92866

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is City of Santa Ana water safe to drink?

City of Santa Ana has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found PFAS above the 2024 federal limits, which systems must meet by 2029. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does City of Santa Ana water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of City of Santa Ana found 5 PFAS at least once. The highest entry-point averages were above the federal limit for PFOA and PFOS: PFOA 8.1 ppt, PFOS 13.5 ppt (limit 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt for the others).

What is the lead level in City of Santa Ana water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of Santa Ana is 0 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2024. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.