Tap Water Results

City of Tustin water quality

Tustin, CA · serves 65,143 people (14,187 connections) · Purchased surface water · Local government · EPA ID CA3010046

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Irvine Ranch Water District, Golden State Water Company – Cowan Heights, East Orange County Water District – Wz, City of Santa Ana. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit3 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 37.9 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2024. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 5 entry points tested Mar 2023 to Nov 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
One sample above limit
Limit 4 ppt
2.1 ppt
52% of the limit
4.2 ppt4 pptOne sample above limit
PFHxS
Detected, below limit
Limit 10 ppt
3.35 ppt
34% of the limit
3.5 ppt10 pptDetected, below limit
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.340.351Detected, below limit
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
1.85 ppt3.7 pptnoneDetected, no limit

29 PFAS tested, 3 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 9 of 14 samples. Highest result 37.9 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2022 – Dec 2024). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 5.3 ppb (Dec 2018).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2022 – Dec 20240 ppb
Jan 2019 – Dec 20210 ppb
Jan 2016 – Dec 20185.3 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2013 – Dec 20150 ppb
Jan 2010 – Dec 20127 ppb
Jan 2007 – Dec 200910 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 20067 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20067 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20054 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20034 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 20034 ppb
Jan 2000 – Dec 20002 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
3
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
8
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese2.91 ppb300 ppb13 of 21UCMR 4 (2020)
Chromium-60.4 ppb–18 of 20UCMR 3 (2013)
Molybdenum20.2 ppb40 ppb20 of 20UCMR 3 (2014)
1,4-Dioxane0.2 ppb0.35 ppb7 of 14UCMR 3 (2013)
Vanadium7.7 ppb21 ppb20 of 20UCMR 3 (2014)
Chlorate132 ppb210 ppb19 of 20UCMR 3 (2013)
Strontium1.09 ppm1.5 ppm20 of 20UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Tustin

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 92705, 92780

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is City of Tustin water safe to drink?

City of Tustin has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does City of Tustin water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of City of Tustin found 3 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in City of Tustin water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of Tustin is 0 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2024. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.