Is Beaumont, CA tap water safe?
Supplied by Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District · serves 66,841 people (22,214 connections) · Groundwater · EPA ID CA3310002
Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it
Summary
No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.
- PFAS
- Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 20 samples (2023–2025).
- Lead
- Below action level7.8 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2024. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
- Violations
- None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
- Built before 1986, or not sure what your service line is made of? Check your service line and test your tap. Utility data can't show your pipes.
- Tested your own tap? Compare your result with these numbers. Moving? Compare this system with another.
- Read Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District's annual water quality report (Consumer Confidence Report). It lists every regulated contaminant tested and is usually on the utility's website or mailed with your bill, and you can also request it at (951) 845-9581. EPA: how to find it.
PFAS (“forever chemicals”)
EPA UCMR 5: 10 entry points tested Mar 2023 to Sep 2023. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.
| Contaminant | Highest average |
|---|---|
| PFOA Not detected Limit 4 ppt | – |
| PFOS Not detected Limit 4 ppt | – |
| PFHxS Not detected Limit 10 ppt | – |
| PFNA Not detected Limit 10 ppt | – |
| HFPO-DA (GenX) Not detected Limit 10 ppt | – |
| Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit) Not detected Limit 1 | – |
| PFBS Not detected Guideline 2,000 ppt | – |
| PFBA Not detected Guideline 6,000 ppt | – |
| PFHxA Not detected Guideline 3,000 ppt | – |
29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.
Lithium
Not detected in 20 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.
Lead and copper
Latest 90th percentile: 7.8 ppb lead (Jan 2022 – Dec 2024). Below action level
| Monitoring period | Lead (90th pct.) |
|---|---|
| Jan 2022 – Dec 2024 | 7.8 ppb |
| Jan 2019 – Dec 2021 | 0 ppb |
| Jan 2016 – Dec 2018 | 0 ppb |
Earlier results (9)
| Jan 2013 – Dec 2015 | 0 ppb |
| Jan 2010 – Dec 2012 | 0 ppb |
| Jan 2007 – Dec 2009 | 0 ppb |
| Jan 2006 – Dec 2006 | 5 ppb |
| Jan 2004 – Dec 2006 | 0 ppb |
| Jan 2003 – Dec 2005 | 0 ppb |
| Jan 2003 – Dec 2003 | 5 ppb |
| Jan 2001 – Dec 2003 | 0 ppb |
| Jan 2002 – Dec 2002 | 5 ppb |
Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.
Violations
Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.
Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)
| Contaminant | Highest | Guideline |
|---|---|---|
| Manganese | 35 ppb | 300 ppb |
| Chlorate | 110 ppb | 210 ppb |
| Chromium-6 | 14 ppb | – |
| Vanadium | 31 ppb | 21 ppb |
| Molybdenum | 2.5 ppb | 40 ppb |
| Strontium | 0.26 ppm | 1.5 ppm |
Where it serves
Beaumont, Yucaipa
ZIP codes the system reported serving: 92223, 92399
Nearby utilities
- Lake Hemet Municipal Water District Hemet · 10 mi
- Yucaipa Valley Water District Yucaipa · 12 mi
- Nuevo Water Company Nuevo · 12 mi · PFAS above limit
- Eastern Municipal Water District Perris · 16 mi
- Redlands City Municipal Utility District – Water Division Redlands · 17 mi · PFAS above limit
- East Valley Water District Highland · 20 mi · PFAS above limit
Questions
Is Beaumont tap water safe to drink?
Most of Beaumont gets its water from Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District. Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.
Does Beaumont water have PFAS?
EPA tested Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District for 29 PFAS between Mar 2023 and Sep 2023 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).
What is the lead level in Beaumont water?
The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District is 7.8 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2024. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.
Check these numbers yourself
Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:
- EPA's own report for CA3310002: violations, enforcement and inspections, straight from EPA.
- EPA UCMR 5 data: the PFAS and lithium results (search the file for PWSID CA3310002).
- EPA SDWIS download: the lead results, population and violation records we use.
- The utility's annual water quality report (Consumer Confidence Report): ask Beaumont Cherry Valley Water District at (951) 845-9581, or see EPA's guide to finding it.
Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.
Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.