Tap Water Results

Lake Hemet Municipal Water District water quality

Hemet, CA · serves 52,913 people (14,439 connections) · Groundwater · Local government · EPA ID CA3310022

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Eastern Municipal Water District. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 19 samples (2023–2025).
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 16.2 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2025. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved1 health-based violation since 2016, most recently Jun 2022. One required an urgent public notice within 24 hours (the kind behind boil-water notices), most recently Jun 2022. What to do if you get a notice.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 10 entry points tested Apr 2024 to Mar 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 6 of 19 samples. Highest result 16.2 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2023 – Dec 2025). Below action level

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2023 – Dec 20250 ppb
Jan 2020 – Dec 20220 ppb
Jan 2017 – Dec 20190 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2014 – Dec 20160 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 20130 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20109.3 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20070 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20045 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20040 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 20030 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20026 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 20015 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

1
Health-based since 2016
1
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
4
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Jun 2022E. coli was confirmed in the water. E. coli means the water may have been contaminated with sewage or animal waste.
Urgent public notice required What that means
EPA record: Revised Total Coliform Rule · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, E. coli (RTCR)
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese5.9 ppb300 ppb9 of 20UCMR 4 (2020)
Strontium0.93 ppm1.5 ppm32 of 33UCMR 3 (2015)
Chromium-62 ppb–30 of 33UCMR 3 (2015)
Chlorate52 ppb210 ppb8 of 33UCMR 3 (2015)
Vanadium68 ppb21 ppb32 of 33UCMR 3 (2015)
Molybdenum17 ppb40 ppb32 of 33UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

Hemet, Sage, San Jacinto

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 92543, 92544, 92583

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Lake Hemet Municipal Water District water safe to drink?

Lake Hemet Municipal Water District had 1 health-based violation since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Lake Hemet Municipal Water District water have PFAS?

EPA tested Lake Hemet Municipal Water District for 29 PFAS between Apr 2024 and Mar 2025 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).

What is the lead level in Lake Hemet Municipal Water District water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Lake Hemet Municipal Water District is 0 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2025. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.