Tap Water Results

Is Sacramento, CA tap water safe?

Supplied by City of Sacramento Main · serves 527,979 people (145,625 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID CA3410020

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Sacramento gets its water from City of Sacramento Main. Parts of the city are served by 3 smaller systems: California American Water – Fruitridge Vista (16,075 people), California American Water – Arden (4,178 people), California State Fair Water System (80 people). Your water bill names your system.

Buys water from Sacramento Suburban Water District, SCWA Mather-Sunrise, California American Water – Fruitridge Vista, California American Water – Arden, California American Water – Suburban Rosemont, California American Water – Parkway, SCWA – Laguna/Vineyard, SCWA – Arden Park Vista. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

PFAS above the 2024 federal limits. Systems have until 2029 to meet the PFAS limits.

Is it an emergency? No: PFAS limits are about years of exposure, not a glass of water, and nothing in EPA's data calls for you to stop drinking the water today. If your utility ever issues a boil-water or do-not-drink notice, follow it.

PFAS
Above limitPFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, the PFAS Hazard Index above the federal limit in EPA's 2023–2025 testing (PFOA 16.4 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, PFOS 38.9 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, PFHxS 18.8 ppt vs a limit of 10 ppt, where ppt = parts per trillion).
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 25.4 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2023. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 13 entry points tested Aug 2023 to May 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
16.4 ppt
4.11× the limit
17.3 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFOS
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
38.9 ppt
9.71× the limit
41.4 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFHxS
Above limit
Limit 10 ppt
18.8 ppt
1.88× the limit
19.1 ppt10 pptAbove limit
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Above limit
Limit 1
1.881.911Above limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
6.15 ppt6.2 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
7.2 ppt7.4 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
6 ppt6.3 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
6.45 ppt6.5 pptnoneDetected, no limit
PFHpA
Detected, no limit
4.25 ppt4.4 pptnoneDetected, no limit

What the utility says it is doing: CapRadio reported in August 2026 that the city deactivated wells identified as PFAS-contaminated in 2024 and is using a 3M settlement to site and drill new wells. The utilities director said PFAS were not detected in 2025 report testing.

Source: What happened after Sacramento sued over forever chemicals found in groundwater (news report), 2026-08-26. Collected by us on Nov 14, 2026, not from EPA's data. Ask the utility for the latest.

For context: the PFOA average is higher than at 99% of the California systems EPA tested, the PFOS average is higher than at 99% of the California systems EPA tested and the PFHxS average is higher than at 98% of the California systems EPA tested.

29 PFAS tested, 8 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 2 of 28 samples. Highest result 25.4 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2021 – Dec 2023). Below action level

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2021 – Dec 20230 ppb
Jan 2018 – Dec 20200 ppb
Jan 2015 – Dec 20170 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2012 – Dec 20140 ppb
Jan 2009 – Dec 20110 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 20087.4 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20057.4 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20050 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 200410 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20025 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 20015 ppb
Jan 1999 – Dec 19995 ppb

Lead service lines: City of Sacramento Main's inventory lists 0 lead, 0 galvanized lines that need replacing, 0 of unknown material out of 146,067 service lines (as of 2026-08-01). As published by the utility.

Source (the utility, collected by us on Nov 14, 2026, not EPA data) · Checking your own line

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
0
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
2
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese21 ppb300 ppb15 of 33UCMR 4 (2020)
Chromium-68 ppb–44 of 44UCMR 3 (2014)
Strontium0.43 ppm1.5 ppm42 of 42UCMR 3 (2015)
1,4-Dioxane0.19 ppb0.35 ppb2 of 20UCMR 3 (2014)
Molybdenum1 ppb40 ppb1 of 42UCMR 3 (2015)
Vanadium41 ppb21 ppb42 of 42UCMR 3 (2015)
Chlorate61 ppb210 ppb1 of 44UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Sacramento

28 ZIP codes the system reported serving

95652, 95660, 95673, 95758, 95811, 95814, 95815, 95816, 95817, 95818, 95819, 95820, 95821, 95822, 95823, 95824, 95825, 95826, 95828, 95829, 95831, 95832, 95833, 95834, 95835, 95838, 95841, 95864

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Sacramento tap water safe to drink?

Most of Sacramento gets its water from City of Sacramento Main. City of Sacramento Main has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found PFAS above the 2024 federal limits, which systems must meet by 2029. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Sacramento water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of City of Sacramento Main found 8 PFAS at least once. The highest entry-point averages were above the federal limit for PFOA and PFOS and PFHxS: PFOA 16.4 ppt, PFOS 38.9 ppt, PFHxS 18.8 ppt (limit 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt for the others).

What is the lead level in Sacramento water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of Sacramento Main is 0 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2023. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.