Tap Water Results

Is West Sacramento, CA tap water safe?

Supplied by City of West Sacramento · serves 55,991 people (15,924 connections) · Surface water · EPA ID CA5710003

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Summary

An unresolved health-based violation.

Is it an emergency? No: these findings are about longer-term exposure, and nothing in EPA's data calls for you to stop drinking the water today. If your utility ever issues a boil-water or do-not-drink notice, follow it.

PFAS
Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 3 samples (2023–2025).
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2025 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
1 unresolved1 health-based violation since 2016, most recently Oct 2024.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 1 entry point tested May 2024 to Jul 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 3 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2025 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 1.5 ppb (Dec 2016).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2025 – now (in progress)0 ppb
Jan 2020 – Dec 20220 ppb
Jan 2017 – Dec 20190 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2014 – Dec 20161.5 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 20132.2 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20100 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 200711 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 200611 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20041.1 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20041.1 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 20031 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 20011.2 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

1
Health-based since 2016
1
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
1
Health-based unresolved now (plus 1 paperwork)
3
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Oct 2024The system did not publish the required inventory of lead service lines (due October 2024). It says nothing about lead levels in the water.
EPA record: Lead and copper rule revisions · LSL Inventory
Unaddressed
Unaddressed

1 unresolved monitoring or reporting violation: Lead and copper rule revisions.

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese1.15 ppb300 ppb3 of 4UCMR 4 (2018)
Strontium0.13 ppm1.5 ppm8 of 8UCMR 3 (2015)
Vanadium3.6 ppb21 ppb8 of 8UCMR 3 (2015)
Chromium-60.27 ppb–8 of 8UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

West Sacramento

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 95605, 95691

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is West Sacramento tap water safe to drink?

Most of West Sacramento gets its water from City of West Sacramento. City of West Sacramento has 1 unresolved health-based violation on record. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does West Sacramento water have PFAS?

EPA tested City of West Sacramento for 29 PFAS between May 2024 and Jul 2025 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).

What is the lead level in West Sacramento water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of West Sacramento is 0 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2025 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.