Cucamonga Valley Water District water quality
Ontario, CA · serves 213,375 people (48,472 connections) · Surface water · Local government · EPA ID CA3610018
Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it
Buys water from San Gabriel Valley Water Company – Fontana, City of Upland, Ontario Municipal Utilities Company. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.
Summary
No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.
- PFAS
- Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 20 samples (2023–2025).
- Lead
- Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2024. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
- Violations
- None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
- Built before 1986, or not sure what your service line is made of? Check your service line and test your tap. Utility data can't show your pipes.
- Tested your own tap? Compare your result with these numbers. Moving? Compare this system with another.
- Read Cucamonga Valley Water District's 2026 water quality report (Consumer Confidence Report, from the utility). It lists every regulated contaminant tested, including ones not on this page. Questions: (909) 987-2591.
PFAS (“forever chemicals”)
EPA UCMR 5: 8 entry points tested Jun 2023 to Jun 2026. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.
| Contaminant | Highest average |
|---|---|
| PFOA Not detected Limit 4 ppt | – |
| PFOS Not detected Limit 4 ppt | – |
| PFHxS Not detected Limit 10 ppt | – |
| PFNA Not detected Limit 10 ppt | – |
| HFPO-DA (GenX) Not detected Limit 10 ppt | – |
| Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit) Not detected Limit 1 | – |
| PFBS Not detected Guideline 2,000 ppt | – |
| PFBA Not detected Guideline 6,000 ppt | – |
| PFHxA Not detected Guideline 3,000 ppt | – |
29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.
Lithium
Not detected in 20 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.
Lead and copper
Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2022 – Dec 2024). Below action level
Highest since 2016: 2 ppb (Dec 2018).
| Monitoring period | Lead (90th pct.) |
|---|---|
| Jan 2022 – Dec 2024 | 0 ppb |
| Jan 2019 – Dec 2021 | 0 ppb |
| Jan 2016 – Dec 2018 | 2 ppb |
Earlier results (9)
| Jan 2013 – Dec 2015 | 0 ppb |
| Jan 2010 – Dec 2012 | 0 ppb |
| Jan 2007 – Dec 2009 | 0 ppb |
| Jan 2006 – Dec 2006 | 5 ppb |
| Jan 2004 – Dec 2006 | 0 ppb |
| Jan 2003 – Dec 2005 | 0 ppb |
| Jan 2003 – Dec 2003 | 5 ppb |
| Jan 2000 – Dec 2002 | 0 ppb |
| Jan 2000 – Dec 2000 | 5 ppb |
Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.
Violations
Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.
Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)
| Contaminant | Highest | Guideline |
|---|---|---|
| Manganese | 4.7 ppb | 300 ppb |
| Chromium-6 | 3.3 ppb | – |
| Strontium | 0.35 ppm | 1.5 ppm |
| Molybdenum | 6.2 ppb | 40 ppb |
| Vanadium | 25 ppb | 21 ppb |
| Chlorate | 400 ppb | 210 ppb |
Where it serves
Ontario, Fontana, Rancho Cucamonga, Upland
ZIP codes the system reported serving: 91701, 91729, 91730, 91737, 91739, 91764, 91784, 92336
Nearby utilities
- Ontario Municipal Utilities Company Ontario · same area · PFAS above limit
- City of Chino Chino · 5 mi
- Monte Vista Water District Montclair · 6 mi · PFAS above limit
- City of Upland Upland · 6 mi
- Jurupa Community Services District Jurupa Valley · 8 mi
- City of Norco Norco · 8 mi · PFAS above limit
Questions
Is Cucamonga Valley Water District water safe to drink?
Cucamonga Valley Water District has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.
Does Cucamonga Valley Water District water have PFAS?
EPA tested Cucamonga Valley Water District for 29 PFAS between Jun 2023 and Jun 2026 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).
What is the lead level in Cucamonga Valley Water District water?
The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Cucamonga Valley Water District is 0 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2024. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.
Check these numbers yourself
Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:
- EPA's own report for CA3610018: violations, enforcement and inspections, straight from EPA.
- EPA UCMR 5 data: the PFAS and lithium results (search the file for PWSID CA3610018).
- EPA SDWIS download: the lead results, population and violation records we use.
- Cucamonga Valley Water District's 2026 water quality report: the utility's own annual report, including contaminants EPA's national database doesn't carry (link checked Nov 14, 2026). Phone: (909) 987-2591.
- Cucamonga Valley Water District website
Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.
Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.