Tap Water Results

Great Oaks Water Company Inc water quality

San Jose, CA · serves 112,582 people (21,578 connections) · Groundwater · Private · EPA ID CA4310022

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from San Jose Water. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit4 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 16 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2024 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 19 entry points tested Jun 2025 to Dec 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
One sample above limit
Limit 4 ppt
2.3 ppt
57% of the limit
4.6 ppt4 pptOne sample above limit
PFHxS
Detected, below limit
Limit 10 ppt
6.7 ppt
67% of the limit
8 ppt10 pptDetected, below limit
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.670.81Detected, below limit
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
4.25 ppt4.5 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
4.6 ppt4.7 pptnoneDetected, no limit

29 PFAS tested, 4 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 34 of 38 samples. Highest result 16 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2024 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 4.4 ppb (Dec 2017).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2024 – now (in progress)0 ppb
Jan 2021 – Dec 20230 ppb
Jan 2018 – Dec 20201.2 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2015 – Dec 20174.4 ppb
Jan 2012 – Dec 20144 ppb
Jan 2011 – Dec 20132.9 ppb
Jan 2008 – Dec 20100 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20075 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 200616 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20066.5 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20055 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20046.5 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
0
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
6
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese2.3 ppb300 ppb13 of 34UCMR 4 (2020)
Chromium-66.8 ppb–28 of 28UCMR 3 (2015)
Vanadium2.8 ppb21 ppb28 of 28UCMR 3 (2015)
Chlorate60 ppb210 ppb7 of 28UCMR 3 (2015)
Molybdenum1.1 ppb40 ppb1 of 28UCMR 3 (2015)
Strontium0.85 ppm1.5 ppm28 of 28UCMR 3 (2015)

Where it serves

San Jose

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 95037, 95111, 95119, 95120, 95123, 95136, 95138, 95139, 95193

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Great Oaks Water Company Inc water safe to drink?

Great Oaks Water Company Inc has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Great Oaks Water Company Inc water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Great Oaks Water Company Inc found 4 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Great Oaks Water Company Inc water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Great Oaks Water Company Inc is 0 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2024 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.