Tap Water Results

Is Oxnard, CA tap water safe?

Supplied by Oxnard Water Dept · serves 200,232 people (42,804 connections) · Purchased surface water · EPA ID CA5610007

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Oxnard gets its water from Oxnard Water Dept. Parts of the city are served by a smaller system: Channel Islands Beach Community Services District (5,011 people). Your water bill names your system.

Buys water from Calleguas Municipal Water District, United Water Cons District. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Not detectedNone of 29 PFAS found above EPA's reporting limits in 12 samples (2023–2025).
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 39 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2025 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
None health-basedNo health-based violations since 2016.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 3 entry points tested Mar 2023 to Dec 2023. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Not detected
Limit 1
––1Not detected
PFBS
Not detected
Guideline 2,000 ppt
––2,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 0 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 12 of 12 samples. Highest result 39 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2025 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 6.1 ppb (Dec 2018).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2025 – now (in progress)0 ppb
Jan 2022 – Dec 20242.2 ppb
Jan 2019 – Dec 20214.2 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2016 – Dec 20186.1 ppb
Jan 2013 – Dec 20153.3 ppb
Jan 2010 – Dec 20123.4 ppb
Jan 2007 – Dec 20096.4 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 20068.2 ppb
Jan 2004 – Dec 20068.2 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20056.3 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20037 ppb
Jan 2001 – Dec 20036.3 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

0
Health-based since 2016
0
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
6
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese15 ppb300 ppb11 of 12UCMR 4 (2018)
Vanadium3.8 ppb21 ppb12 of 12UCMR 3 (2014)
Molybdenum11 ppb40 ppb12 of 12UCMR 3 (2014)
1,4-Dioxane0.12 ppb0.35 ppb1 of 9UCMR 3 (2014)
Chromium-60.37 ppb–12 of 12UCMR 3 (2014)
Strontium1.1 ppm1.5 ppm12 of 12UCMR 3 (2014)
Chlorate150 ppb210 ppb7 of 12UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Oxnard

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 93030, 93033, 93035, 93036

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Oxnard tap water safe to drink?

Most of Oxnard gets its water from Oxnard Water Dept. Oxnard Water Dept has no health-based violations since 2016. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Oxnard water have PFAS?

EPA tested Oxnard Water Dept for 29 PFAS between Mar 2023 and Dec 2023 and none were detected above the reporting limits (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical).

What is the lead level in Oxnard water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Oxnard Water Dept is 0 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2025 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.