Tap Water Results

Ventura Water Department water quality

San Buenaventura (Ventura), CA · serves 112,285 people (29,119 connections) · Surface water · Local government · EPA ID CA5610017

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Casitas Municipal Water District. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

No federal limits exceeded in EPA data.

PFAS
Detected, below limit2 of 29 PFAS found at least once. All averages below the federal limits.
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 140 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level0 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period Jan 2024 – now, still in progress (results reported so far). Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved1 health-based violation since 2016, most recently Jul 2018.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 4 entry points tested Jan 2023 to Oct 2023. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFOS
Not detected
Limit 4 ppt
––4 pptNot detected
PFHxS
Detected, below limit
Limit 10 ppt
0.75 ppt
8% of the limit
3 ppt10 pptDetected, below limit
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.0750.31Detected, below limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
0.78 ppt3.1 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Not detected
Guideline 3,000 ppt
––3,000 ppt guidelineNot detected

29 PFAS tested, 2 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 12 of 12 samples. Highest result 140 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 0 ppb lead (Jan 2024 – now (in progress)). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 5.1 ppb (Dec 2017).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2024 – now (in progress)0 ppb
Jan 2021 – Dec 20230 ppb
Jan 2018 – Dec 20202.2 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2015 – Dec 20175.1 ppb
Jan 2012 – Dec 20140 ppb
Jan 2009 – Dec 20111 ppb
Jan 2006 – Dec 20081 ppb
Jan 2005 – Dec 20059 ppb
Jan 2003 – Dec 20059 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20023 ppb
Jan 1999 – Dec 20010 ppb
Jan 1999 – Dec 19995 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

1
Health-based since 2016
0
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
4
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Jul 2018The running annual average for TTHM was above the legal limit.
EPA record: TTHM · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average · measured 0.081 mg/l (limit 0.080 mg/L)
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese14 ppb300 ppb6 of 8UCMR 4 (2020)
Molybdenum22 ppb40 ppb11 of 12UCMR 3 (2014)
Vanadium1.3 ppb21 ppb10 of 12UCMR 3 (2014)
Chromium-60.19 ppb–5 of 12UCMR 3 (2014)
Chlorate910 ppb210 ppb7 of 12UCMR 3 (2014)
Strontium1.6 ppm1.5 ppm10 of 10UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

San Buenaventura (Ventura)

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 93001, 93002, 93003, 93004, 93005, 93006, 93007

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Ventura Water Department water safe to drink?

Ventura Water Department had 1 health-based violation since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found no PFAS above the federal limits. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Ventura Water Department water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Ventura Water Department found 2 PFAS at least once. None of the averages were above the federal limits.

What is the lead level in Ventura Water Department water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Ventura Water Department is 0 ppb, for the monitoring period that began Jan 2024 (still in progress). The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.