Tap Water Results

Widefield Water & Sanitation District water quality

Security-Widefield, CO · serves 27,640 people (10,631 connections) · Purchased surface water · Local government · EPA ID CO0121900

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Buys water from Security Water District, Fountain Valley Authority, City of Fountain. Treated water bought from another system can carry that system's contaminants.

Summary

PFAS above the 2024 federal limits. Systems have until 2029 to meet the PFAS limits.

Is it an emergency? No: PFAS limits are about years of exposure, not a glass of water, and nothing in EPA's data calls for you to stop drinking the water today. If your utility ever issues a boil-water or do-not-drink notice, follow it.

PFAS
Above limitPFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, the PFAS Hazard Index above the federal limit in EPA's 2023–2025 testing (PFOA 10.3 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, PFOS 11.8 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, PFHxS 27.8 ppt vs a limit of 10 ppt, where ppt = parts per trillion).
Lithium
Above screening levelHighest result 78.6 ppb. EPA uses 10 ppb to decide what to study further. It is not a health limit, and there is no federal limit for lithium. About 1 in 4 systems tested were above it.
Lead
Below action level1.9 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2025. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved1 health-based violation since 2016, most recently Jan 2017.
What you can do
  • Pregnant, or mixing baby formula with tap water? Babies drink more water for their size, so PFAS exposure matters more for them. Consider bottled water or a filter certified for PFAS for formula, and ask your doctor. Health effects.
  • To lower your PFAS exposure now, a home filter certified for PFAS reduction works (reverse osmosis, or activated carbon certified to NSF/ANSI 53 or 58). Filters for these results.
  • Built before 1986, or not sure what your service line is made of? Check your service line and test your tap. Utility data can't show your pipes.
  • Tested your own tap? Compare your result with these numbers. Moving? Compare this system with another.
  • Read Widefield Water & Sanitation District's annual water quality report (Consumer Confidence Report). It lists every regulated contaminant tested and is usually on the utility's website or mailed with your bill, and you can also request it at (719) 390-7111. EPA: how to find it.

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 9 entry points tested May 2023 to Feb 2024. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
10.3 ppt
2.56× the limit
10.5 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFOS
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
11.8 ppt
2.96× the limit
15.8 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFHxS
Above limit
Limit 10 ppt
27.8 ppt
2.78× the limit
28.4 ppt10 pptAbove limit
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Above limit
Limit 1
2.792.851Above limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
15.9 ppt16.7 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 6,000 ppt
39.8 ppt42 ppt6,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
130 ppt141 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
104 ppt109 pptnoneDetected, no limit
PFPeS
Detected, no limit
5.05 ppt5.3 pptnoneDetected, no limit

For context: the PFOA average is higher than at 99% of the Colorado systems EPA tested, the PFOS average is higher than at 98% of the Colorado systems EPA tested and the PFHxS average is higher than at 99% of the Colorado systems EPA tested.

29 PFAS tested, 8 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Detected in 22 of 24 samples. Highest result 78.6 ppb. EPA's non-enforceable screening level is 10 ppb. Above screening level The screening level is how EPA decides what to study further, not a health limit. There is no federal limit for lithium and no filter is certified to remove it. About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 1.9 ppb lead (Jan 2025 – Dec 2025). Below action level

Highest since 2016: 8.1 ppb (Jun 2022).

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2025 – Dec 20251.9 ppb
Jan 2024 – Jun 20244 ppb
Jul 2023 – Dec 20234.2 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jan 2023 – Jun 20236 ppb
Jul 2022 – Dec 20225.8 ppb
Jan 2022 – Jun 20228.1 ppb
Jul 2021 – Dec 20215.8 ppb
Jan 2021 – Jun 20215.5 ppb
Jul 2020 – Dec 20202.7 ppb
Jan 2020 – Jun 20202.6 ppb
Jul 2019 – Dec 20192.5 ppb
Jan 2019 – Jun 20192.6 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

1
Health-based since 2016
69
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now
81
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Jan 2017The running annual average for TTHM was above the legal limit.
EPA record: TTHM · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average · measured 0.087 mg/l (limit 0.080 mg/L)
Resolved
Resolved

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese149 ppb300 ppb6 of 10UCMR 4 (2019)
Chromium-60.62 ppb–36 of 49UCMR 3 (2014)
Chlorate390 ppb210 ppb27 of 49UCMR 3 (2014)
1,4-Dioxane0.13 ppb0.35 ppb10 of 17UCMR 3 (2014)
Vanadium0.96 ppb21 ppb34 of 49UCMR 3 (2014)
Strontium0.57 ppm1.5 ppm49 of 49UCMR 3 (2014)
Molybdenum6 ppb40 ppb47 of 49UCMR 3 (2014)

Where it serves

Security-Widefield

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 80817, 80911, 80925

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Widefield Water & Sanitation District water safe to drink?

Widefield Water & Sanitation District had 1 health-based violation since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found PFAS above the 2024 federal limits, which systems must meet by 2029. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Widefield Water & Sanitation District water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of Widefield Water & Sanitation District found 8 PFAS at least once. The highest entry-point averages were above the federal limit for PFOA and PFOS and PFHxS: PFOA 10.3 ppt, PFOS 11.8 ppt, PFHxS 27.8 ppt (limit 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt for the others).

What is the lead level in Widefield Water & Sanitation District water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for Widefield Water & Sanitation District is 1.9 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2025. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.