Tap Water Results

Is Riviera Beach, FL tap water safe?

Supplied by City of Riviera Beach Utility District · serves 46,762 people (13,562 connections) · Groundwater · EPA ID FL4501229

Data: U.S. EPA · How we read the data · How we check it

Most of Riviera Beach gets its water from City of Riviera Beach Utility District. Parts of the city are served by a smaller system: Palm Lake Estates North Water System (480 people). Your water bill names your system.

Summary

PFAS above the 2024 federal limits. Systems have until 2029 to meet the PFAS limits.

Is it an emergency? No: PFAS limits are about years of exposure, not a glass of water, and nothing in EPA's data calls for you to stop drinking the water today. If your utility ever issues a boil-water or do-not-drink notice, follow it.

PFAS
Above limitPFOA, PFOS above the federal limit in EPA's 2023–2025 testing (PFOA 13.5 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, PFOS 27 ppt vs a limit of 4 ppt, where ppt = parts per trillion).
Lead
Below action level2.4 ppb (parts per billion) at the 90th percentile: 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below it. Action level 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in Nov 2027. Monitoring period ending Dec 2023. Your home's pipes can make yours higher.
Violations
Resolved10 health-based violations since 2016, most recently Jun 2023. One required an urgent public notice within 24 hours (the kind behind boil-water notices), most recently Jun 2023. What to do if you get a notice.
What you can do

PFAS (“forever chemicals”)

EPA UCMR 5: 1 entry point tested Sep 2024 to Mar 2025. "Average" is the highest entry-point average (non-detects counted as zero), the way EPA compares UCMR 5 results to the limits. ppt = parts per trillion. These results do not determine compliance.

ContaminantHighest averageHighest resultLimitStatus
PFOA
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
13.5 ppt
3.38× the limit
14 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFOS
Above limit
Limit 4 ppt
27 ppt
6.75× the limit
31 ppt4 pptAbove limit
PFHxS
Detected, below limit
Limit 10 ppt
7.05 ppt
71% of the limit
7.2 ppt10 pptDetected, below limit
PFNA
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
HFPO-DA (GenX)
Not detected
Limit 10 ppt
––10 pptNot detected
Hazard Index (a combined score for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and PFBS, where above 1 is over the limit)
Detected, below limit
Limit 1
0.710.721Detected, below limit
PFBS
Detected, below limit
Guideline 2,000 ppt
3.45 ppt3.8 ppt2,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFBA
Not detected
Guideline 6,000 ppt
––6,000 ppt guidelineNot detected
PFHxA
Detected, below limit
Guideline 3,000 ppt
5.75 ppt5.8 ppt3,000 ppt guidelineDetected, below limit
PFPeA
Detected, no limit
6.9 ppt6.9 pptnoneDetected, no limit
PFHpA
Detected, no limit
4.15 ppt4.2 pptnoneDetected, no limit

For context: the PFOA average is higher than at 98% of the Florida systems EPA tested and the PFOS average is higher than at 95% of the Florida systems EPA tested.

29 PFAS tested, 7 detected at least once. "Not detected" means below EPA's reporting limit (about 2 to 20 ppt depending on the chemical), not proven zero. PFAS not listed were not detected. The limits for PFHxS, PFNA, GenX and the Hazard Index were proposed for rescission in May 2026. That proposal is not final. Systems have until 2029 to meet the limits.

Lithium

Not detected in 2 samples (reporting limit 9 ppb). About lithium.

Lead and copper

Latest 90th percentile: 2.4 ppb lead (Jan 2023 – Dec 2023). Below action level

Monitoring periodLead (90th pct.)
Jan 2023 – Dec 20232.4 ppb
Jan 2020 – Dec 20202.1 ppb
Jan 2017 – Dec 20170.4 ppb
Earlier results (9)
Jul 2014 – Dec 20141.6 ppb
Jul 2011 – Dec 20111.9 ppb
Jul 2008 – Dec 20082 ppb
Jan 2002 – Dec 20021 ppb
Jan 1999 – Dec 19995 ppb
Jan 1996 – Dec 19960 ppb
Jan 1995 – Dec 19955 ppb
Jan 1994 – Dec 19946 ppb
Jan 1993 – Jun 19932 ppb

Lead comes from pipes and fixtures, not the source water, so it varies home to home. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 sampled homes were at or below it. More on lead.

Violations

10
Health-based since 2016
71
Monitoring/reporting since 2016
0
Health-based unresolved now (plus 2 paperwork)
162
Total ever recorded, incl. paperwork
WhenWhat happenedStatus
Jun 2023E. coli was confirmed in the water. E. coli means the water may have been contaminated with sewage or animal waste.
Urgent public notice required What that means
EPA record: Revised Total Coliform Rule · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, E. coli (RTCR)
Archived
Archived
Jul 2017 – Jul 2018
5 times
The running annual average for TTHM was above the legal limit.
EPA record: TTHM · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average · measured 89.6 ug/l (limit 0.080 mg/L)
Resolved
Resolved
Apr 2018The running annual average for Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) was above the legal limit.
EPA record: Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Average · measured 74.9 ug/l (limit 0.060 mg/L)
Resolved
Resolved
Jan 2016 – Feb 2016
2 times
Too many samples in a month tested positive for coliform bacteria, a sign the system may be letting germs in.
EPA record: Coliform (TCR) · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Monthly (TCR) (limit 5% of samples)
Resolved
Resolved
Feb 2016Too many samples in a month tested positive for coliform bacteria, a sign the system may be letting germs in.
EPA record: Coliform (TCR) · Maximum Contaminant Level Violation, Monthly (TCR) (limit 5% of samples)
Archived
Archived

2 unresolved monitoring or reporting violations: Public Notice, Lead and Copper Rule.

Health-based violations mean a contaminant exceeded a limit or a required treatment step was missed. Monitoring and reporting violations mean required tests or reports were late or missing, so the water's quality during that time is unknown. The total includes every violation in EPA's records, most of them paperwork.

Earlier EPA testing (2013–2020)

ContaminantHighestGuidelineDetectedTested
Manganese3.7 ppb300 ppb2 of 2UCMR 4 (2020)
1,4-Dioxane0.28 ppb0.35 ppb2 of 2UCMR 3 (2016)
Chromium-60.29 ppb–4 of 4UCMR 3 (2016)
Strontium0.87 ppm1.5 ppm4 of 4UCMR 3 (2016)
Vanadium0.58 ppb21 ppb4 of 4UCMR 3 (2016)

Where it serves

Riviera Beach

ZIP codes the system reported serving: 33404, 33419

Nearby utilities

Questions

Is Riviera Beach tap water safe to drink?

Most of Riviera Beach gets its water from City of Riviera Beach Utility District. City of Riviera Beach Utility District had 10 health-based violations since 2016, all since resolved. EPA testing found PFAS above the 2024 federal limits, which systems must meet by 2029. Federal data can't tell you about your own pipes: lead comes from service lines and plumbing, so test your tap if your home was built before 1986. For the official word, read the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report.

Does Riviera Beach water have PFAS?

Yes. EPA's 2023–2025 testing of City of Riviera Beach Utility District found 7 PFAS at least once. The highest entry-point averages were above the federal limit for PFOA and PFOS: PFOA 13.5 ppt, PFOS 27 ppt (limit 4 ppt for PFOA and PFOS, 10 ppt for the others).

What is the lead level in Riviera Beach water?

The most recent 90th-percentile lead result for City of Riviera Beach Utility District is 2.4 ppb, for the period ending Dec 2023. The federal action level is 15 ppb, falling to 10 ppb in November 2027. The 90th percentile means 9 in 10 homes sampled were at or below this number. Individual homes can be higher.

Check these numbers yourself

Every figure on this page comes from public EPA records. You don't have to take our word for it:

Found something that doesn't match? Tell us and we'll check it against EPA's records. How we check our data.

Source: U.S. EPA drinking water records and PFAS testing (UCMR 5). How we read the data.